This
month’s column focuses on a “nitty gritty” issue: getting the most from one’s
wells. This applies to new and mature wells, and to gas, oil and injection
wells. It spans drilling and completion, stimulation, and operations. It is
inspired by a March workshop in California on production enhancement techniques.
Mason Medizade with Petrolects LLC and a professor of mechanical engineering at
Cal Poly laid the groundwork, focusing on sources of damage and subsequent
production enhancement. Representatives from Baker Petrolite, Halliburton and
Schlumberger shared insights from their individual and corporate perspectives.
Skin is a term used to measure well bore damage. Positive skin indicates damage;
negative skin indicates stimulation. Among the many potential causes for skin
are damage to the formation itself, partial completion and slant wells,
perforations, and pseudo skins caused by phase change or high flow rates.
Along the height of the producing interval, especially if multiple zones are
producing, different formation properties and pressures lead to uneven skin
effects. Uneven skin effects also can be present in horizontal wells. Uneven
skin effects can be counteracted using diversion techniques during stimulation.
Skin caused by partial completion and slant wells is addressed through better
completion engineering. Skin will be positive if less than 70 percent of the pay
zone is perforated. Skin is negative for slant wells, and the larger the angle,
the larger the negative skin will be. Perforating underbalanced minimizes
perforation skin.
Damage to the formation itself may result from particles plugging pore spaces,
fines migration, chemical precipitation, fluid damage, emulsions, relative
permeability and wettability effects, mechanical damage, and biological damage.
When naturally present fines bridge pore throats, local permeability is
essentially zero. For bridging to occur, particle sizes must be on the order of
0.33-0.14 the size of the pore throat or larger. Most formation fines are
water-wet, so the presence of a mobile water phase can cause fines migration and
subsequent formation damage.
Fluids (drilling fluid filtrate, completion fluids, stimulation fluids and
injection brine) should have a nondamaging ionic composition. The higher the
formation brine pH, the more sensitive the porous media will be to salinity
changes. To minimize damage, brines should contain at least 2 percent by weight
KCl with 0.1 percent of the cations being divalent. Water sensitivity is
greatest for NaCl brines, and decreases in the order Na, K and NH4. Inorganic
precipitates usually result from divalentcations (Ca, Ba) combining with CO3
or SO4 sulfate ions.
Precipitates can result from injecting fluids containing CaCl2 or
from liberated CO2 near the well bore as a result of pressure drop.
Completion fluids should be filtered and should contain no more than two parts
per million solids of a size less than two microns. Injected fluids also should
be filtered so no particles larger than two microns are present.
Paraffin can precipitate when temperature is reduced or the oil composition
changes with gas liberation as pressure is reduced.
There are a variety of paraffin management tools: operating practices,
mechanical control (scrapers), and chemical (both prevention and removal).
Certain polymers inhibit crystal growth. Properly chosen surfactants render
paraffin particles water-wet so that they will flow with produced water.
Asphaltene, which is naturally dispersed in crude oil, precipitates as a result
of pressure drop, shear (turbulent flow), acids, CO2-injected
condensate, or mixing of incompatible crudes. In matrix acidizing, iron ions in
solution can promote asphaltene precipitation. Asphaltene flocculation can
result in a severe loss in productivity. Aromatic solvents normally are used to
remove asphaltene from near the well bore. Asphaltene dispersants are used
before applying acids or heat to the reservoir.
Emulsions, which have higher viscosity than the oils they are formed from,
typically are formed chemically through the introduction of surfactants or
fines. Water block, an increase in water saturation around the well bore, and
wettability change from water-wet to oil-wet can reduce oil movement. Properly
designed kill fluids can break emulsion or water blocks.
Regarding drilling damage, studies indicate that mud particles may invade up to
one foot, while mud filtrate can invade up to six feet. Damage is more serious
in horizontals, especially near the heel where the formation is exposed longer.
There
is inevitably some damage around perforations. Both drilling-and
perforating-induced damage can be minimized with under-balanced operations.
For further
information, contact Mason Medizade at
mm@petrolects.com. For those really interested in the topic, SPE Monograph
No. 19, “Completion and Workover Fluids,” can be ordered at
www.spe.org. Dewey Sparlin at International
Completion Consultants Inc. (phone 281-444-1014) occasionally delivers an SPE
short course titled, “Formation Damage Prevention.” John Campanella at Norwest
Questa Engineering is delivering a Rocky Mountain workshop on successfully
awakening mature oil fields on May 20 in Golden, Co. (www.eventbrite.com/event/94763440).
A portion of the agenda undoubtedly will address damage/enhancement.