|
State-of-the-Art
Summary
|
|
Carbon Dioxide Storage: Opportunities for the E&P Industry
by
Karl Lang
with Hart Energy Publishing, LP |
|
Between the two extremes of the climate
change debate—denial that warming is taking place on one end
of the spectrum and hyperbolized consequences and demands for
drastic economic sacrifice at the other end—a middle ground is
forming that relies on technological innovation. The idea is
that a near-term solution could be to capture and permanently
store (sequester) carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
from our largest and most concentrated streams (power plants,
refineries, etc) in geologic formations. This approach would
allow us to continue to use our most abundant and inexpensive
forms of energy (oil, gas and coal) while reducing carbon
dioxide's contribution to global warming. The US Department of
Energy sees this approach as one possible transition to an
eventual zero-emission, hydrogen-fueled future, and is deeply
involved in helping to develop the technologies needed to
enable subsurface geologic sequestration on a wide scale.
The oil and gas E&P industry can play a leading role in this
effort. Well acquainted with the injection of high-pressure
gases, the industry can provide a link between the capture of
CO2 for environmental benefit and the injection of
that CO2 for incremental oil or gas recovery. The
best near-term opportunity for safely and economically
sequestering CO2 may lie at the original source of
much of that nasty carbon, our own oilfields and coalfields.
Once cost effective techniques are developed to capture CO2,
there are significant volumes of economically recoverable oil
that can be produced in conjunction with its storage. Nearly
all of this resource lies in older fields, many of which are
now being operated by independent producers. This article
outlines the efforts underway and the estimated size of the
potential "prize" that might be producible under different
scenarios of technological growth and economic stimulation.
DOE Research Goal
is Emission-Free Power Production
The Department of Energy's (DOE) CO2 sequestration
program, managed by the National Energy |
Technology Laboratory, is comprised of two
primary elements: a core R&D program and a regional
sequestration partnership program, both of which provide
support for the development of FutureGen, a $1 billion
industry/government partnership to design, build and operate a
coal gasification-based, nearly emission-free, coal-fired
electricity and hydrogen production plant.
The goal of the sequestration element of the
program is to enable captured CO2 to be separated and
permanently sequestered in depleted oil and gas reservoirs,
unmineable coal seams, deep saline aquifers, or other
formations. DOE also manages a variety of other research
designed to reduce emissions (e.g., power generation equipment
improvements) or to develop other means of disposal than
geologic sequestration (e.g., oceanic storage). |
Efforts in the core R&D program, underway
since 1998, focus on technologies for carbon capture,
sequestration, and storage as well as monitoring,
mitigation and verification. The regional partnership
initiative, announced in November 2002, is comprised of seven
partnerships of state agencies, universities, and
private companies that form a nationwide network to help
determine the best approaches for capturing and permanently
storing gases that can contribute to global climate change.
The partnerships include 216 organizations spanning 40 states,
three Indian nations, and four Canadian provinces.
Geographical differences in the use of fossil fuels and the
options for sequestration dictate that a regional approach is
necessary. The primary purposes of the regional partnerships
are to develop the framework needed to validate and
potentially deploy carbon
|
|
Table 1: DOE
Regional Sequestration Partnerships |
Region
|
States |
Lead
Organization
|
E&P Industry
Partners
|
Total Partners
|
Total
Funding
|
|
Midwest |
IN, KY, MI, MD, OH, PA, WV |
Battelle Mem. Inst.
|
BP
DTE Energy
|
31 |
$3.51MM |
|
Southeast |
AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC,
SC, TN, TX, VA |
Southern States
Energy Board
|
Advanced Resources Intl. |
13 |
$2 MM |
|
Southwest |
AZ, CO, KS, NE, NM, OK, TX,
UT, WY |
New Mexico Tech
|
Advanced Resources Intl.
Burlington Resources
ChevronTexaco ERTC
ChevronTexaco Permian BU
ConocoPhillips
KinderMorgan CO2
Marathon Oil Co.
Oxy Permian Ltd.
Yates Petroleum Corp. |
25 |
$2.15 MM |
|
West Coast |
AK, AZ, CA, NV, OR, WA |
California Energy
Commission
|
Amerada Hess
Eagle Operating, Inc.
Fischer Oil and Gas
North Dakota Pet. Council
|
47 |
$2.15 MM |
|
Big Sky |
ID, MT, SD, WY |
Montana State University
|
|
14 |
$2 MM |
|
Plains |
IA, MO, MN, ND, NE, MT, SD,
WI, WY |
University North Dakota
|
Amerada Hess
Eagle Operating, Inc.
Fischer Oil and Gas
North Dakota Pet. Council
|
29 |
$2.75 MM |
Midwest
Geologic
Sequestration Consortium |
IL, IN, KY |
Univ. Illinois and IL Geol.
Survey
|
IOGCC
KY Oil and Gas Assoc.
IN Oil and Gas Assoc.
IL Oil and Gas Assoc. |
21 |
$3.25 MM |
|
|
|

|
|
7
Network News |
|
 
|
|
|