Tech Transfer Track

Moving Up The Passive Seismic Learning Curve

Bob Hardage, Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin, published an article about passive seismic in the July 2008 issue of AAPG’s Explorer magazine. It is an excellent foundational article for those wanting to learn where passive seismic fits in the exploration bag of tricks.

Passive seismic involves collecting seismic data without using an active seismic source. There are many sources of low frequency energy—ocean waves (even far inland), wind, noise, passing aircraft, and mechanical vibrations from operating equipment. However, if one focuses in on the 1 - 4 Hz range, noise from ocean energy (generally below 1 Hz) and anthropogenic sources (generally above 4 Hz) is minimized. It’s not yet known why higher energy in this range is associated with subsurface hydrocarbons, but the evidence from work in several continents is confirming it is. By itself, amplitude tells nothing about depth or size of the source, but researchers are working around this by applying reverse time modeling.

Passive seismic can be more than just an exploration tool. Subsurface microseismic events can be related to the progression of dynamic reservoir processes, such as hydraulically stimulated fracture growth (think frac

monitoring, which is widely accepted), injected fluid movement, reservoir compaction, fault movements, etc.

Those interested in seriously exploring this topic might consider an international workshop (www.eage.org/events/index.
php?eventid=94
): Passive Seismic; Case Studies and Applications for Field Development and Exploration planned for March 2009 in Cyprus.

SEC Proposes Rule Changes to Reserves Reporting

In late June the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it has proposed revised oil and gas company reporting requirements to help provide investors with a more accurate and useful reserves picture.

The proposed rule changes will allow companies to determine their reserves in a manner consistent with existing technologies and will allow investors to better understand the reserve quantities and their implications. The SEC’s proposed rule changes include:

  • Permitting use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable conclusions about reserves volumes.

  • Enabling companies to additionally disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors. Current rules limit disclosure to only proved reserves.
  • Allowing previously excluded resources, such as oil sands, to be classified as oil and gas reserves. Currently these resources are considered to be mining reserves.
  • Requiring companies to report the independence and qualifications of a preparer or auditor, based on current Society of Petroleum Engineers’ criteria.
  • Requiring the filing of reports for companies that rely on a third party to prepare reserves estimates or conduct a reserves audit.
  • Requiring companies to report oil and gas reserves using an average price based upon the prior 12-month period-rather than year-end prices, to maximize the comparability of reserve estimates among companies and mitigate the distortion of the estimates that arises when using a single pricing date.

Excerpted from SEC press release (www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-122.htm) Public comment on the proposed rule changes should be received by the SEC no later than 60 days after their publication in the Federal Register.

  Table of Contents


Network News
5


Previous | Next   

PTTC

July 2008