Interest Growing In Improved Oil Recovery Technologies
(Tech Connections Column, July 2006, American Oil
and Gas Reporter)
It is no secret we are all getting older, a fact obvious to
those working in the oil and gas industry. Mark Rubin, executive
director of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, says the average age of working members in the United States is 52 and that 70 percent of members working in the exploration and production industry are between the ages of 41 and 65, while only 20 percent are 36 or younger.
As oil prices remain strong and oil discoveries become smaller
and harder to find, the independents that operate the vast majority of mature
domestic reservoirs are taking another look at improved oil recovery (IOR)
processes. The prize is substantial. The Department of Energy estimates that
while 197 billion barrels of oil have been produced in the United States, more
than 400 billion barrels of known reserves remain in the ground, while only 116
billion barrels remain to be discovered.
Nowhere was the interest in IOR more evident than at the April
SPE/DOE IOR Symposium in Tulsa. Seven hundred delegates from 26 countries
attended (20 percent more than 2004) to hear experts in plenary sessions discuss
issues in carbon dioxide, chemical and polymer flooding. Those presentations are
available online at
www.ior2006.org/speaker_presentations.asp.
More than 100 papers were presented to packed rooms in sessions
on thermal recovery, miscible and immiscible gas injection, reservoir
conformance, field applications, reservoir simulation, CO2
injection, and chemical, polymer and microbial flooding. Proceedings are
available through www.ior2006.org, or individual papers can be purchased through
www.spe.org.
Eight short courses giving practical, hands-on information were similarly well
attended.
Turnout at the PTTC-organized Independents Day session was
strong. With a focus on the Mid-Continent, speakers presented case studies on
horizontal drilling, dewatering, alkalinesurfactant- polymer flooding,
gas-assisted (CO2) gravity stable flooding,
and fluid pulsation. A summary of the session is available at
www.pttc.org/solutions/sol_2006/554.pdf, and a pdf of the session
workbook can be obtained by contacting
klovendahl@pttc.org.
As is customary, the Oil & Gas Journal’s biennial IOR survey was
published in its April 17 edition preceding the symposium. Several changes were
evident from the 2004 survey. Eleven new CO2
projects were initiated and overall production was up 32,000 barrels of oil a
day, in large part because of Anadarko’s new Wyoming projects. Sixteen
additional CO2 projects are under way in
Mississippi, Texas, Oklahoma, Michigan and Kansas. Five new in-situ combustion
projects were initiated in North and South Dakota, with two more planned. Two
surfactant-polymer pilots are under way in Oklahoma and are described in the
Independents Day presentations. The biggest decline came in steamflood
production, which is down 54,000 bbl/d.
Air injection (in-situ combustion) is an example of a process
that was tried in the 1970s, but fell out of favor because of generally poor
technical and economic results, although an exception is the activity in North
and South Dakota. With an improved understanding of the process and modern
technology, there is renewed interest. At a PTTC West Coast Region workshop on
the topic, several experts reviewed the California projects from the 1970s–at
one time there were dozens producing several thousand barrels of oil a day from
heavy oil reservoirs.
They reviewed the mechanisms and processes that provided the
pressure, crude upgrade, and viscosity reduction to move the oil. Also discussed
were the reasons these projects seldom lived up to expectations: the rusting and
plugging of injectors with asphaltene, emulsions, subsurface scale and
corrosion, as well as gas buildup at the producers.
However, given the billions of barrels of heavy oil remaining in
place–61-69 percent of the original oil–and modern technology such as horizontal
drilling, better production procedures and equipment, and a better understanding
of the process mechanisms, this technology may prove viable today. The new
projects in North and South Dakota suggest this is the case. The workshop was
attended by researchers, producers and royalty owners, several of whom were
looking for information that would help them determine whether their heavy oil
holdings were good candidates and how to undertake engineering studies.
PTTC also is facilitating additional CO2 flooding. At a Midwest
Regional workshop last November, speakers discussed the reservoir mechanics,
economic factors and operational issues involved in initiating and producing a
CO2 flood. The history of activity in the
Michigan Basin was reviewed and potential anthropogenic sources of CO2
were identified. The planned Michigan CO2
project cited in the Oil & Gas Journal survey will utilize CO2 from a local
refinery.
PTTC also hosted a day-long “state-of-the-art” meeting that
highlighted best practices for CO2-enhanced
oil recovery earlier this year in Houston as a preproposal meeting to introduce
a DOE solicitation for enhanced oil and gas production through CO2 injection.
Presentations are posted along with a workshop summary that provides
participants’ perceptions of future technology needs at
www.pttc.org/workshop_doe_co2/DOE_CO2_EOR_Presentations.htm.

This gives a picture of what is happening in “conventional” IOR,
but industry is actively working in the “unconventional” realm of oil shale
also. In January, the Bureau of Land Management announced the names of eight
applicants (http://www.blm.gov/nhp/news/releases/pages/2006/pr060117_oilshale.htm)
whose proposals for oil shale R&D were judged eligible for continued
consideration. It’s interesting to note that 20 nominations were submitted to
BLM in that solicitation.
|