Prior interviews have provided the
perspectives of a larger technology provider and individual
innovators. Closing the loop on interviews about technology
commercialization and uptake, PTTC sought input from Ali
Daneshy, Daneshy Consultants, Intl. In addition to his
technical expertise in several areas, Daneshy is well known
for his insights on "technology uptake." He has authored
columns in Hart's E&P, plus led the recent SPE Advanced
Technology Workshop on "Accelerating Technology Acceptance."
His insights to questions posed by PTTC follow.
Q:
It is
self-explanatory that both producers AND technology providers
MUST BE INVOLVED for uptake of newer technologies in a timely
fashion. Prior interviews have focused on the technology
developer's perspective. From your experience working both
sides of the equation, what do you think the producer needs to
bring to the table for timely uptake to occur?
A:
Acceptance and successful use of new technology is not a
trivial task. It requires technical, operational and
leadership skills, as well as a progressive attitude. More
specifically, these include;
- Strong technical
backbone related to the new technology. The more
complex or revolutionary the technology, the stronger the
required backbone and the difficulty to integrate the new
with the old.
- Willingness and
ability to take risk. The willingness is mostly a
personal trait. Ability is related to access to financial
resources, as well as the culture and business drivers of
the organization. Organizations need to adopt business
measures that reduce the immediate risk of being an early
technology adopter.
- A healthy mix of
long and short term business objectives. The
value of many technologies comes from their long term use.
|
- Time.
Maturity of use and operational reliability of the new
technology improves with time. So does the ability to know
how and where to apply it. Just as reading golf instruction
manuals does not make a person a golfer, reading about new
technology does not make an expert. One needs to go through
the learning process, which involves actual hands-on
experience.
- Visibility and
measurement. There is no disagreement about the
long term value of technology. If so, it needs to be
included as one of the direct measures by which successful
business practices are identified.
- Involvement.
All new technologies mature with use. During this phase an
involved and interested user can play a pivotal role in the
speed and direction of technology maturity.
Q:
The circumstances of a very
small producer, mid-sized independent, large independent and
major are quite different. How does what the producer brings
to the table vary with the size of company?
A:
Larger companies are more process and policy-driven than
smaller ones. While these improve cost and operational
efficiency and predictability, they also may hinder innovation
and risk-taking. Larger companies are more likely to have
access to broader in-house technical skills, but this also
slows down the decision-making process. The technical staff in
smaller companies has a larger involvement in purchasing
decisions than in larger companies. Larger companies have more
elaborate purchasing processes that often discourage
acceptance of new technology in favor of lower direct costs.
Emphasis on cost is even more dominant in National Oil
Companies for whom direct cost is often the only mechanism for
awarding contracts. |

The reorganization of large companies into
smaller Business Units and Asset Teams was intended to create
the best of both worlds; the efficiency of a large company
together with the speed and focus of a small company. While in
many regards this has been a successful business strategy, it
is doubtful that it has helped accelerate acceptance of new
technology. Within the oil and gas industry, the general
opinion is that small and mid-size Operators are more
receptive to new technology than the Majors. This point has a
tremendous impact on the use of technology by the industry.
The profitability of a new technology depends on its ability
to go beyond the innovators and early adopters and become
acceptable to early majority and pragmatists. This involves
larger oil and gas and National Oil Companies.
Market studies clearly show the slow adoption
of new technology by the oil and gas industry. Changing this
market dynamic is going to be slow and will require awareness
and participation of all industry segments. It will require a
change in industry business philosophy, shifting focus from
short term cost to long term value. Major oil and gas
companies with their proven successful record of implementing
change are natural candidates to lead this effort.
|
|
Dr. Ali Daneshy is the Director
of Petroleum Engineering Program at the University of Houston
and a partner in Dapish Oil and Gas Strategy Consultants,
which provides consultation services related to analysis,
business planning, marketing and launch of new technology. He
has over 30 years of experience in the development and launch
of new technology in the oil and gas industry. During his
tenure at Halliburton he was the Vice President of Integrated
Technology Products and responsible for the launch of several
novel technology-based business units, including Enventure
Global Technology.
Dr. Daneshy has published extensively on innovation, use of
technology, and novel strategies for profitable technology
launch. He also conducts short courses on these topics for the
oil and gas industry. |