Environmental

Natural Gas Leak Detection Systems Tested at RMOTC

In late September 2004, DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory sponsored field tests of advanced technologies for remote sensing of natural gas leaks at the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC) in Wyoming. RMOTC simulated a pipeline system about 7.5 miles long with 15 leak sites with rates ranging from 1 scfh to 5,000 scfh. There were different leak release options, even some decoys, so technologies being tested were truly put to the test.

Tested technologies included: passive infrared multi-spectral scanning, laser-based differential absorption LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), hyperspectral imaging, and tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy. Sensor systems were mounted in an unmodified automobile, a helicopter, or a fixed-wing aircraft. Equipment providers included En'Urga Inc., ITT Industries, Inc. LaSen, Inc., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, and Physical Sciences, Inc.

Test results confirm that many of the leak sites were found. General observations from the test results are:

  • Leak rates of 500 scfh or higher were detected at least 50% of the time.
  • Leak rates of 100 scfh were only detected 15% of the time.
  • Leak rates of 15 and 10 scfh were only detected about 5% of the time.
  • The 1 scfh leak rate was never detected.
  • There were a large number of "false positive" leak sites identified.

With a week of testing, some equipment providers were able to make improvements during the week, while other providers defined modifications for future work. There were also lessons learned about procedures for conducting future leak detection field tests.

The full report (7.3 mb) is available online at www.netl.
doe.gov/scngo/Natural%20Gas/
publications/t&d/final%20
Report_RMOTC.pdf
.

DOE Releases LNG Safety Study

DOE recently released a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) safety and security study conducted by Sandia National Laboratories. While

accepted standards exist for the systematic safety analysis of spills or releases from LNG storage terminals on land, no equivalent set of standards exists for safety or consequences of LNG spills over water. The report reviews several existing studies of LNG spills with respect to their assumptions, inputs, models and experimental data.

The following conclusions, which are only a partial list, were developed by Sandia:

  • Risks from accidental LNG spills, such as from collisions and groundings, are small and manageable with current safety policies and practices.
  • Consequences from an intentional breach can be more severe than those from accidental breaches, but these intentional breach risks can be significantly reduced with appropriate security, planning, prevention and mitigation.
  • The most significant impacts exist within approximately 500 m of a spill, due to thermal hazards, with lower public health and safety impacts beyond approximately 1,600 m.
  • Although large, unignited LNG vapor releases are unlikely, they could spread over distances greater than 1,600 m (to 2,500 m for a nominal intentional spill).

Sandia noted that modeling the dynamics and dispersion of a spill over water is hampered by (1) very limited historical and empirical information since current LNG ship design and safety procedures have reduced accidents greatly and (2) the experimental data that are available are more than 100 times smaller than spill sizes currently being postulated for some intentional events.

The full Sandia report is available online at www.fe.doe.gov/pro
grams/oilgas/storage/lng/sandia_
lng_1204.pdf
.

Canadian Provinces Added to Two DOE Regional Sequestration Partnerships

DOE recently announced that Alberta and British Columbia have joined Saskatchewan and Manitoba as Canadian partners in the Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program. The Department of Energy selected seven original partnerships in August 2003. With the addition of organizations from Alberta and British Columbia, the partnerships now include 216 organizations spanning 40 states, three Indian nations, and four Canadian provinces.

Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership. In January 2005 Alberta joined Manitoba and Saskatchewan as Canadian provinces participating along with nine states (from Iowa to Montana/Wyoming) in the Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership. Alberta shares many of the geologic and physiographic characteristics of the existing partnership region. The Alberta Energy and Utility Board and Alberta Environment will contribute information on Alberta CO2 sources, transportation infrastructure, and the vast geologic formations to the partnership's geographic information system and decision-support tools. Ducks Unlimited Canada will expand their work on characterizing the potential for Prairie Pot Hole Region Wetlands in Alberta to sequester carbon and offset other greenhouse gas emissions through future restoration projects.

West Coast Regional Sequestration Partnership. British Columbia joined six states in the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership in December 2004. British Columbia has a significant amount of hydrocarbon-bearing sedimentary basins that could be used to store CO2 while simultaneously enhancing recovery. Within these sedimentary basins are saline reservoirs that have huge potential storage capacity but need better characterization. In addition, several mineral deposits exist that could be used to permanently store carbon dioxide by converting it to a solid material. The British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, which has previous experience characterizing their geographic area for sequestration opportunities, has created a database of potential sequestration sites, CO2 sources, and transportation infrastructure.

View DOE techline at www.netl.
doe.gov/publications/press/2005/
tl_sequestration_canada.html
. For information on all regional sequestration partnerships, visit www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/
sequestration/partnerships/index.
html
.

EPA’s Natural Gas
STAR Program


Producer’s Tech Transfer Workshop Co-sponsored by Devon Energy Corporation

April 20, 2005
Oklahoma City, OK

http://yosemite.epa.gov/
oar/gasreg.nsf/content/
Producers2.htm

 

3
Network News