Table of Contents

Previous | Next    

Environmental

Developments in the Produced Water Arena

One element of DOE's produced water program focuses on produced water and the many issues associated with it. Several recent developments deserve notice.

Produced Water Management Information System (PWMIS) (http://web.evs.anl.gov/pwmis/). DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory, in partnership with Argonne National Laboratory, has developed the web-based PWMIS. The new system offers critical information on current technologies and best practices, summaries of relevant state and Federal regulations and a decision tree for technology options to deal with produced water issues. PWMIS is an easily navigable web tool that consolidates all the required information in one location.

Desalination Unit. In a DOE-supported project Texas A&M University has developed a new technology to remove salts and minerals from brackish coproduced water, yielding safe drinking water. The project's mobile desalination unit can process as much as 238 bwpd. It enables one to re-use about 30 percent of a well's wastewater stream, reducing the volume and costs of salt water disposal. The technology has been licensed to GeoPure Water Technologies LLC to commercialize. View further information in DOE's Techline online at www.netl.doe.
gov/publications/press/2007/
070720-Oil_and_Gas_Produced-Water.html.

Guide to Management of Produced Water. The Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC) in cooperation with ALL Consulting has completed a comprehensive new guidebook to the current best management practices for produced water from conventional gas and oil operations. The guidebook, entitled A Guide to Practical Management of Produced Water from Onshore Oil & Gas Operations in the United States, is available through IOGCC's website (www.iogcc.state.ok.us/
projects.aspx
). The project also developed an online geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis tool to help producers understand watershed-related regulations and permits and calculate the impacts of produced water in specific areas according to various oil and gas field development scenarios. The online guidebook and GIS tools will help regulatory agencies devise more effective regulations to make water management easier while still maintaining environmental protection.

Closed-Loop Drilling: One Operator's Experience in NM

Drilling pits are an issue in New Mexico. Although perceived as

DOE Receives AAPG's Corporate Award for Excellence in Environmental Stewardship

The American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) recently recognized DOE for its work in a network of regional carbon sequestration partnerships by selecting them for their "Corporate Award for Excellence in Environmental Stewardship." Nearly 350 organizations in 41 U.S. states, four Canadian provinces and three Indian nations are involved. A two-year characterization phase identified more than 3,500 billion tons of potential CO2 storage capacity in geologic formations. The partnerships are currently working to implement 25 geologic sequestration tests.

View further information in DOE's Techline online at www.fe.doe.gov/
news/techlines/2007/07026-DOE
_Earns_Environmental_Award
.html
.

being more costly than traditional  pits, that is not necessarily so. Cimarex Energy Co. described their experience using an engineered on- site drilling waste treatment system on nearly 40 wells in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico. Cimarex found that the average cost of using a pit and hauling the waste elsewhere for disposal is about 45% more compared to following the same process without a reserve pit. When burying the waste on-site, costs are about 24% higher when using a reserve pit. Cuttings volumes are significantly less, some 60 to 70% less. To top it off, the footprint of the drilling operation is reduced.

Excerpted from "Closed-Loop Drilling System: A Viable Alternative to Reserve Waste Pits," World Oil, December 2006, pp. 41-48 available online at www.worldoil.com/mag
azine/MAGAZINE_DETAIL.asp?
ART_ID=3053&MONTH_YEAR=
Dec-2006
.

SEQURETM Well Finding Technology

The SEQURE well finding technology, developed by NETL researchers in partnership with Apogee Scientific,

Inc. (Englewood, Colo.), Fugro Airborne Surveys  (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and LaSen, Inc. (Las Cruces, N.M.), employs magnetic and methane sensors deployed on helicopters to accurately locate abandoned and leaking wells. Finding these wells is valuable for secondary and tertiary recovery projects, but it is absolutely critical in future CO2 sequestration projects. SEQURE, along with two other technologies developed in DOE-supported R&D projects, received an R&D 100 Award from R&D Magazine for 2007.

For more information, view DOE's TechLine at www.fe.doe.gov/news
/techlines/2007/07058-FE_Tech
nologies_Win_Awards.html
.

Green Completions in Fort Worth Basin Attractive for Devon

During a May 2007 EPA Natural Gas STAR workshop, Devon Energy Corp. shared their experience with reduced-emission or "green" completion practices in their Fort Worth Basin operations. With conventional practices, a well is flowed back to frac tanks until clean up is completed. Tubing is then snubbed in the hole while venting gas to atmosphere. Gas during required open flow potential tests is also vented to atmosphere. With reduced-emission completions, a temporary flowline and meter run is on location during completion. The well is flowed back to frac tanks until gas is encountered, at which time the well is turned to sales and revenue realized during further cleanup, snubbing and testing. In their Fort Worth Basin operations Devon's incremental costs are about $6,000 per well—but the incremental revenue from sale of captured gas is more than 10 times that. The work environment is safer and wells can be cleaned up longer. Since starting the practice in March 2004 through 2006, Devon had captured and sold about 3.7 Bcf of natural gas, realizing about $20 million in profits.

For more information, view Devon's presentation online at www.epa.gov/gasstar/workshops
/collegestation-may2007/7-comp
letions.pdf.

EPA's Natural Gas STAR Program
     
Aug. 21-22 Long Beach, CA Producer Tech Transfer Meeting
Sep. 11 Glenwood Springs, CO Producer Tech Transfer Meeting
Sep. 13 Durango, CO Producer Tech Transfer Meeting
Oct. 23-24 Houston, TX Annual Implementation Meeting

Recommended Practices Check them out - make or save $ and protect the environment

www.epa.gov/gasstar/

  Table of Contents


Network News
5


Previous | Next   

PTTC

July 2007