|
RPSEA Wins Multi-Year DOE Contract to Fund
Research
The Research Partnership to Secure Energy
for America (RPSEA), a non-profit Consortium with 84 members, announced May 10th
that it has been selected to administer part of a new 10 year, $50 million per
year DOE O&G research program created by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT
2005). DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) will oversee the
Consortium. Under terms of the EPACT 2005, 35% of funding will be dedicated to
research of ultra-deepwater, 32.5 % for unconventional natural gas and petroleum
technologies, 7 ˝ % for research benefiting small producers and the remaining
25% for complementary research conducted by NETL. Funding, when appropriated by
Congress, will be from rents and bonuses derived from federal onshore and
offshore oil and gas leases issued under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
and the Mineral Leasing Act. To read the full press release, go to
www.tlc2.
uh.edu/News/RPSEA_press_
release.pdf. Visit
www.rpsea.org to
learn more about RPSEA.
Stripper Well Consortium Announces Research
Projects Funded
In its 2006 program, the Stripper Well
Consortium (SWC) reviewed 18 proposals, making awards to
nine projects totaling $1.24 million of SWC funds.
Best Practices
Guide to Optimizing Multizone Coalbed Natural Gas Well
Completions - WellDog, Inc.
Liquid Lifting from Deviated and Horizontal Tight-Shale
Gas Wells - Colorado School of Mines
Pumper/Well Tender PDA Program for Small Producing
Companies - Oklahoma Marginal Well Commission
Novel Single State Water Mitigation Treatment - Impact
Technologies
Reducing Water Production in Mississippian Reservoirs
Using Gelled Polymer Systems - University of Kansas
Research Center
Advanced ASJ Drilling System - Impact Technologies
Foam Control System for Natural Gas - Composite
Engineers
|
-
Increased Pumping Capacity and Depth for Airlift System
- Airlift Services International
-
Modify and Extend Casing Plunger Technology to Tubing -
PAAL, Inc.
For further detail, visit
www.
energy.psu.edu/swc/projects.html.
RMOTC Data Sets Available
The
Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (RMOTC) has been
working towards gathering its extended historical
paper/digital data (geologic, geophysical, production,
engineering and well data) into a single industry standard
database. This database may be useful for those conducting
tests at RMOTC or those producing from similar reservoirs.
Information from a preliminary database is available to the
public in a CD set. Call RMOTC (888-599-2900) for further
infor-
mation.
Benchmarking Deep Drilling
Part I of this two-part series on a
benchmarking study of deep drilling performed in a
DOE-supported project performed by Schlumberger Data and
Consulting Services describes how the study was performed
and looks at different technology areas. The study examines
in some detail over 3,000 wells drilled in North America
from 1997 - 2001. For the benchmarking, 13
geographic/geological settings were identified. Then summary
descriptions of deep well scenarios were developed for
benchmarking cost component (well depth, type and geographic
grouping). Then the operators' experience was ranked
considering number of deep wells drilled; representative mix
of vertical, deviated, and horizontal drilling experience;
and other factors. This ranking identified the top 140 of
the 497 operators with deep drilling experience,
representing 78 percent of the deep drilling experience.
These operators were then asked for detailed
cost data for the 2,363 wells they drilled. As a first cut,
the total well cost was divided into tangible and intangible
costs and grouped by the scenarios described above. Not
surprisingly, the two most expensive were Gulf Coast
offshore directional exploration wells over 19,000 feet and
Gulf Coast directional exploration wells over 16,500 feet.
The costs were then subdivided into technology area such as
drilling/tripping, tubulars, and drilling fluids and
services. Drilling and tripping accounted for 48% of costs,
followed by tubulars at 17% and drilling fluids at 10%.
|
Excerpted from "Study Benchmarks Deep
Technology," The American Oil and Gas Reporter, May 2006, pp. 79-8. The full
project report is
available through DOE at
www.
netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-
gas/publications/EP/Deep
Trek_Benchmark-All.pdf.
IntellipipeTM Goes Commercial
Grant Prideco recently announced the
commercial launch of its IntelliServ Network and related
Intellipipe™ technology that culminates a five-year R&D
program that received funding support from DOE. This "game-
changing" technology provides a step-change increase in
communications compared to conventional mud pulse, from 3 -
12 bits/second to 57,000 bits/second and there is potential
to upgrade the network to handle one million bits/second. It
is made possible through the high speed, high strength data
cable imbedded on the inside of the drill pipe. This
technology, developed by Novatek Engineering, utilizes small
induction coils installed in protective grooves machined
into the drillpipe connection that allow a low energy signal
to be transmitted between sections without a mechanical
connection or external power supply. Repeater subassemblies
are installed in the drill string at 1,200- to 1,500-foot
intervals to amplify the signal.
In field tests in the U.S. and Canada, the
system has drilled 18 wells, accumulating more than 6,000
hours of operation while drilling 180,000 feet. This
technology was successfully field tested in four wells of a
planned seven-well program by BP America in the Arkoma
Basin. The wells utilized Baker Hughes INTEQ measurement
while drilling (MWD) and logging while drilling (LWD)
connected through the Intellipipe™ to Grant Prideco's
IntelliServe Network. A backup mud pulse system was in
place. This project successfully demonstrated the ability to
provide error-free high-speed information from the MWD/LWD
subassemblies and real-time control of the MWD from the
surface.
See DOE Tech Line (www.
fossil.energy.gov/news/tech
lines/2006/06026-Intellipipe_
Goes_Commercial.html) and "New Wired-Pipe
Telemetry System Tested in Arkoma Basin," Oil & Gas Journal,
Mar. 27, 2006, pp. 40-44.  |