Gulf
Coast Region
|
|
This article captures
insights from a Central/Eastern Gulf workshop on
"Technologies for Developing Naturally Fractured Reservoirs"
held in Shreveport in October. There, several industry
speakers discussed aspects of making good wells in fractured
reservoirs.
One reality with
fractured reservoirs is that they can be quite susceptible
to damage during drilling. Rick Stone, Signa Engineering
Corp., shared how underbalanced drilling can reduce damage
while providing other drilling advantages. From the
reservoir perspective, there is less drilling fluid damage
(filtrate invasion, solids plugging, hydration of sensitive
shales/clays), less drilled cuttings damage, and less skin
damage. Production and ultimate recovery are increased, and
with less damage, stimulation may not be required. With
regards to drilling, justifications include improved
drilling rate, limit loss of circulation, mitigating
differential sticking, controlling surface pressures, and
increased safety. Flow drilling allows the well to flow
while the well is drilled. Downhole influx and surface
pressure is managed with the drilling choke. In addition to
reducing damage, it enables one to evaluate formation
productivity during the drilling stage itself.
One must understand the
fracture system and how flow occurs through it. Conceptual
models should consider geology, geomechanics, seismic, well
logs, direct observation (outcrops, thin sections, cores),
and physical properties. Marisela Sanchez, ITASCA Houston,
Inc., shared about one approach, the Discrete Fracture
Network (DFN) model. This defines a fracture distribution
function, which provides the number of fractures having a
given orientation and length, and belonging to a given
volume of observation. It defines: (1) the probability
distribution of fracture orientations, (2) the dependency on
the size of the sampling domain, and (3) the fracture-length
density distribution. The main scaling parameters are the
fractal dimension and the power-law exponent of the fracture
length distribution. Sanchez noted that fractures are
deformable, responding to the in-situ stresses, pore
pressure and induced stresses during the well's life.
Fractures that are in shear failure (or close to shear
failure) are more likely to preserve or create permeability
paths. Redistribution of the stresses around the well will
change the local fracture aperture and consequently will
affect pressure and permeability.
In any reservoir, including fractured reservoirs, mapping of
hydraulic fracturing has become an extremely useful tool. It
can provide answers about fracture orientation,
fracture length and |

Graphic
courtesy of Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. |
|
fracture height. Those planning fracture stimulation in
horizontal wells face several issues. To optimize
wellbore trajectory and reservoir drainage, one must know
about the fracture geometry. There are questions to be
answered about wellbore trajectory, wellbore coverage,
interval coverage, diversion and staging considerations, and
then there is execution of the fracturing operation itself.
Mapping helps define many of these factors. For some good
examples of insights to be gained through mapping, readers
are encouraged to view a presentation (http://ftworth.spe.org/images/
ftworth/articles/80/Chris%20
Wright%20Presentation.pdf) by Chris Wright, Pinnacle
Technologies Inc. (Pinnacle) at the Ft. Worth SPE Section
Fall Kickoff, Oct. 24, 2007.
During the workshop Steve Wolhart of Pinnacle noted that they
have mapped more than 200 Barnett Shale wells. Early on
(2001-2003), most work was in the core area with thicker
section, more gas and good frac barriers. Work then moved on
to Tier 1 and 2 areas where the Barnett is thinner and there
are no frac barriers. Today most effort is directed towards
mapping horizontal wells. Analysis of production results
indicates that it is Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV), not
fracture half-length that is most important to productivity
and recovery.
Drainage area will largely be confined to the stimulated
network area. Fracture spacing density is very important.
Increasing fracture conductivity can provide significant
benefits for a large network structure. Striving to achieve
higher SRVs, operators are drilling longer laterals,
performing larger jobs, incorporating more stages and more
perfs, performing refracs, etc. One must balance creation of
a dense fracture network with overall network size.
No discussion of fractured reservoirs would
be complete without discussion of borehole imaging. Dan
Buller, Halliburton Energy Services/Numar, illustrated
through many examples how one can gain insights about
secondary porosity, structural geology, mineralization,
hydrocarbon entry and sedimentary structure.
|
It is important to distinguish between
natural and man-made features. Drilling-induced fractures are typically the highest angle
(75-85 degrees) features seen intersecting the wellbore.
There are imaging tools for both water-based and oil-based
systems. One can use sonic shear anisotropy techniques to
detect fractures, but in all cases, borehole imaging is the
preferred method.
One has drilled, logged, modeled and
mapped—the completion equipment and process brings it all
together to make a good well. Rick Middaugh, Halliburton
Energy Services, described the multiple completion options
available—cemented pipe, uncemented pre-perforated pipe,
pinpoint processes with hydrajetting, openhole packer
techniques and near wellbore high energy treatments. Each
has a fit—factors that determine the fit are water concerns,
need for near-wellbore cleanup, removing drilling damage to
the fracture system and economics.
|
|
Workshop Topics
To Look Forward To
(check calendar on
www.pttc.org
for scheduling)
-
Natural
& Anthropogenic Subsidence Impact on Louisiana Coasts
(Louisiana)
-
U.S. Oil
& Gas Technology Summit (U.S. Oil Expo, Mississippi)
-
Coil
Tubing and Slim Hole Drilling Technologies (Louisiana)
-
Integrated Field Studies in Mature Areas (Louisiana)
-
Basin
Analysis & Petroleum Systems, Central & Eastern Gulf of
Mexico (Louisiana)
|
|