Tech Transfer Track


PTTC recognizes that products and services featured in “Tech Transfer Track” may not be unique and welcomes information about other upstream technologies. PTTC does not endorse or recommend any of the products or services mentioned in this publication, even though reasonable steps are taken to ensure the reliability of information sources. Input can be directed to hq@pttc.org.

 2005 World Oil Awards

On October 20 World Oil announced winners of its 2005 Awards. In its fourth year, the awards program recognizes technological advancements and innovative companies. Nominations are gathered over a three-month period, then short-listed to finalists in each category. Award winners are determined by the Awards Advisory Board (21 people) and the Next Generation Committee (15 recent graduates). Winners in selected categories shown below are:

Best Drilling Technology—
Hughes Christensen's EZCase Casing/Liner Drilling System (www.bakerhughes.com/hcc/
diamond/ezcase.htm
): bit technology specifically designed for drilling with casing/liner.

Best Production Technology—
Weatherford International's Optical MultiPhase Flowmeter (www.ep-solutions.com/News_Events_
Whats_New.htm#World
): an all optical, non-intrusive downhole meter.

Best Completion Technology—
Easywell's Swell Packer Technology (www.ews.as/technology/swell): swells when exposed to hydrocarbons, can flex and stay sealed.

Best Exploration Technology—
Health, Safety, Environment/ Sustainable Development: Encana Corporation's Drilling Waste Management System (www.encana.
com/responsibility/cr_reporting/
ehs/stories/sagd.html
): recycles and reuses 90% of drilling waste while greatly reducing cost.

Best Data Management Solution—
Transzap's SpendWorks (www.
transzap.com/services/spendworks
.html
): a web-based system to streamline the procurement-to-pay process.

There are several finalists in each category. Producers are urged to review all finalists— technologies may not have won the award, but they may be just what one needs.

For more details and to view a complete list of recipients, visit: www.awards.worldoil.com.

Downhole Fluidic Oscillator Tool Removes Near Wellbore Damage

The Downhole Fluidics Oscillator, offered by Downhole Fluidics, Inc., creates pulsating pressure waves to break up near wellbore damage. The tool is a true fluidic oscillator, based on the Coanda Effect (http://abcasia
pacific.com/nexus/stories/s704526.
htm
). It does not rely on cavitation to create pressure waves. There are no packer elements to fail. Unlike mechanical tools, which suffer from high-energy losses, the tool maximizes the energy potential of the pumped fluid.

Downhole Fluidics' reports that they have treated more than 2,500 wells in 12 states and seven international areas. In their experience, the tool leads to longer-term production/ injection increases than "similar" tools/processes. Limited case study data are presented on their website. Additional applications reported by them to PTTC include:

  • Injection well (Texas)—cleaned perfs with water, then acid/xylene. Injection rate went from 48 bwpd @ 1,500 psi to 400 bwpd @ less than 2,000 psi.
  • Oil well (Gulf of Mexico)—tool in conjunction with CO2 acid stimulation. Production increased from 1,100 bopd on a 22 choke to 2,100 bopd on a 28 choke.
  • Gas well (south Texas)—tool in conjunction with acid job using the Gidley CO2 process (www.pttc.org/news/
    3qtr2005/v11n3p8.htm
    . Before treatment the well would not produce against line pressure (300 Mcfd @ 800 psi). Production limited by scale and fines in the pack. After treatment the well produced 2,000 Mcfd @ 4,800 psi.
  • Gas storage wells (Oklahoma)—Gas deliverability was improved 32.5% in 14 wells (SPE 91390).

For more information, visit Downhole Fluidics' website (www.
dhfluidics.com
) or contact Andy Rowe (andy.rowe@dhfluidics.
com
).

Quickly Finding Infill-Drilling Potential in Mature Tight Reservoirs

As opposed to performing a complete reservoir evaluation, which involves significant effort and time, a fast approach that extends the moving-window method is proposed. It consists of multiple local analyses, each in an areal window centered on an existing well. Going beyond empirical or statistical analyses, the model-based analysis combines the material balance equation and the equation for pseudosteady-state flow. Parameters used as proxies in the pseudosteady-state-flow model are best-year production (BYP, the best 12-consecutive month production period) and virgin best-year production (VBY, monthly average rate of a well at virgin-reservoir conditions). Well spacing is used as a proxy for drainage.

Tested through simulation, the influences of various parameters were found to be:

  • Heterogeneity: Estimates of average infill-well performance are conservative and become more scattered as the reservoir becomes more heterogeneous.
  • Average Permeability: Estimates become more scattered as average permeability increases (comparing results in 0.2 md and 1.0 md analyses).
  • Search Area: The smaller the search area the better, as long as there are enough wells. Geologically, the search-area size should be small enough to avoid large changes in reservoir properties.

Estimates for individual "picked" locations can vary widely, but it is significant that "average" infill-well performance for different windows was accurately predicted. Thus, while not a tool for estimating individual well performance, the approach is reliable for defining infill-drilling potential in different local areas. Knowing this, operators can avoid infill drilling in the wrong area and focus their development effort in areas of highest potential.

Excerpted from "Fast Method Finds Infill-Drilling Potential in Mature Tight Reservoirs," Journal of Petroleum Technology, Oct. 2005 (www.spe.org/specma/binary/files/
445063991755Syn.pdf
), itself a synopsis of SPE No. 91755.


Network News
4


PTTC

4th Quarter 2005