|
Unconventional Energy for an Unconventional Future
U.S. Lower 48 and Non-Arctic Canadian Gas Production by Type
Barnett Shale Ignites Imagination
Woodford Shale: Decades of Potential
Oklahoma CBM Annual Production
Midcontinent Coalbed Methane
CBM Data Sources Sidebar
Arkoma CBM Development: Horizontal or Vertical?
Great Things to be Achieved Unconventionally
|
Unconventional Energy in
the Southern Midcontinent by
Dylan Powell, hostonwriter.com on PTTC's behalf
Excerpts in
PTTC Network News, 1st Quarter 2004
"Nothing great was ever
achieved without enthusiasm," noted Ralph Waldo Emerson. With
enthusiasm as the measure, numerous speakers involved in
unconventional energy and 345 energetic participants at the
recent Unconventional Energy Resources in the Southern
Midcontinent conference portend further significant growth for
unconventional energy from shale, coalbed methane and tight
gas sands. Insights from hundreds of millions of dollars of
project experience were revealed, which accelerated progress
in the remaining learning curve. The event was organized by
the Oklahoma Geological Survey, with special compliments to
Brian Cardott, and co-sponsored by the U.S. Department of
Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory and PTTC's
South Midcontinent Region.
Unconventional
Energy for an Unconventional Future
A recent National Petroleum
Council study points out that increasing natural-gas-supply
diversity is a serious national issue. Our current energy
landscape forewarns a strong dependence on increasing
unconventional gas production in the lower 48 and Canada. As
David Fleischaker, Oklahoma Secretary of Energy and the
conference's lunch speaker, points out, "Non-conventional
fuels will play an important role in the short- to
mid-term—serving as an essential bridge until the time that we
increase imports by building a pipeline to the North Slope and
increasing our Liquified Natural Gas imports."
The Newark East Barnett Shale
field, the largest active gas field in Texas, now produces
more than 220 Bcf of natural gas per year. Unconventional
energy resources in Oklahoma include Hunton de-watering and
coalbed methane (CBM) activity in the Arkoma and Cherokee
basins. According to Cardott, CBM activity in Oklahoma's
Arkoma Basin produced about 70 Bcf of gas cumulatively through
mid-2003. About two-thirds of this production is from vertical wells, but horizontal
production is rapidly overtaking that from vertical.
Cherokee Basin CBM cumulative production is about 45 Bcf, all
from vertical wells. CBM wells in southeast Kansas are now
producing about 10 Bcf per year, and activity is strong.
Arkansas CBM production is just now taking off.

U.S. Lower 48 and Non-Arctic
Canadian Gas Production by Type
Barnett Shale
Ignites Imagination
As Jeff Hall, Manager of
Exploration and Exploitation with Devon Energy, pointed out
during his presentation, the Barnett Shale is still one of the
most exciting discoveries around. With its first completion in
1981, the Barnett isn't a secret. Estimated resources are as
high as 140 Bcf per square mile across its 54,000 square
miles. Though about 2,500 wells have been drilled in this
field, there is a lot of action forthcoming. Devon, who
operates about 60 percent of the wells in the field, estimates
that recovery from conventional vertical wells will be 10 to
12 percent, with an additional 5 to 10 percent from re-fracs
and additional production enhancements. That leaves 80 percent
of gas-in-place for innovative thinkers who can successfully
leverage new technology!
About 60 companies currently
work the play. Its strong activity stems from evolving Barnett
stimulation knowledge, including re-fracing and horizontal
drilling. Progressive Barnett Shale developers, armed with
frac mapping and tiltmeter technology, noticed that as their
wells produced for a few years, the rock stress environment
changed. When it was re-fractured, orientation of the new fractures was
different from the original fractures.
Because the Mississippian-age
Barnett is so tight, and its drainage area so limited, even a
minor re-orientation of fracs essentially opened up a new
reservoir to production. It is similar to getting a whole new
well at times. Currently, most well workovers involve re-fracing
the Lower Barnett with better frac technology and adding Upper
Barnett perforations. About two-thirds of the production
increase and reserves observed in re-frac treatment
completions come from the Lower Barnett. Although the first
series of re-fracs have proven profitable, none of the wells
are mature enough to test the potential of additional rounds
of re-fracing.
When one considers shale, one
typically thinks of natural fracturing delivering increased
recovery. Not in the Barnett, where fractures are not as
important as thermal maturity. Given the optimum thermal
maturity, the Barnett Shale becomes a stimulation technology
play. "Technology is going to extend the play beyond its core
area," noted Devon's Hall. The play also has surface access
challenges, with the subdivision and strip-mall laden
Dallas-Fort Worth suburbs sprawling just above the action.
Stimulation considerations led to the current trend of
horizontal wells. In the heart of the play, Ordovician tight
limestone provides barriers to keep the large frac treatments
in the Barnett. Moving westward, this lower
frac barrier disappears. Moving southward, both its upper and
lower frac barriers disappear. Horizontal wells where frac
barriers are absent are said to stand the best chance of
staying in zone. And they are being oriented according to
prevailing stress orientations that run southwest to
northeast.
Over time, will re-fracing the Upper Barnett create similar
reorientations as experienced in the Lower Barnett? For
either, would a second re-frac after an extended production
period create yet another frac orientation that would give
production an economic boost? Stay tuned. "When I went to
school at Oklahoma State University and took geology," noted
conference presenter Kent Bowker with Star of Texas Energy
Services, "we did not discuss this rock as a reservoir rock.
We have to re-educate ourselves and try to understand how we
can take what we learn from the Barnett and apply it to other
basins."
Woodford Shale: Decades of Potential
If it took 15 to 20 years to realize significant value from
the Barnett Shale, our goal with the Woodford Shale is to half
the Barnett's learning curve—even if the Woodford doesn't
become as significant a resource as the Barnett has. The prime area for this Upper Devonian/Lower
Mississippian shale's gas potential lies just a couple hundred
miles north of the Barnett Shale, but it is considered to be
where the Barnett Shale was 15 to 20 years ago and gas wells
have not yet proliferated. Current Woodford Shale production
stands at 24 Woodford-only gas leases and 48 Woodford-only oil
leases (oil and associated gas). Cumulative production may be
minimal, but the resource potential is large.
Many questions remain about how to turn
Woodford Shale gas-resource potential into production. As in
the Barnett, will thermal maturity combined with stimulation
technology be the keys to economic production? Or will it be
natural fracturing? Or will it be something else entirely?
Coalbed-methane researchers have developed a six-element
producibility model. Will that model or a modification thereof
help operators unlock the secret to shale gas reservoirs such
as the Woodford?
Midcontinent
Coalbed Methane
CBM activity is robust in the Cherokee Basin
in southeast Kansas and northeast Oklahoma, as well as in the
Arkoma Basin in Oklahoma and Arkansas. In the Arkoma Basin,
the Oklahoma Geological Survey reports that 605 vertical CBM
wells produced 44 Bcf of gas from 1989 to mid-2003 and 182
horizontal CBM wells in the Arkoma produced over 27 Bcf of gas
from 1998 to mid-2003. Eight hundred and forty-four CBM wells
in the northeast Oklahoma shelf produced over 45 Bcf of gas
between 1994 and 2003.

Oklahoma CBM Annual Production
Cherokee Basin production, which with a few
exceptions comes from vertical wells, is now about 11 Bcf per
year in northeast Oklahoma and 10 Bcf per year in southeast
Kansas. In the Oklahoma side of the Arkoma Basin, production
from horizontal-well completions has now exceeded that from
vertical wells-around 12 Bcf per year versus 8 Bcf per year
from vertical wells. CBM activity in Arkansas is embryonic,
limited almost exclusively to horizontal wells in the Lower
Hartshorne coal.
When it comes to Midcontinent CBM, what we
know depends on where we are. In Kansas, there is a strong
focus on CBM resource definition, including looking further
north into the Forest City Basin. The Kansas Geological Survey
has developed isopach maps for different coals and is
developing depositional interpretations that will turn them
into treasure maps. Understanding gas content is still
critical in Kansas. Limited sampling indicates that it can be
quite variable. Contrary to logic, some of the shallower coals
can have higher gas content!
"The Western Interior Coal Region is vast,
located in six states and 87,000 square miles," commented
Simon Testa, who summarized some of his results gathered by
TICORA Geosciences, Inc. (www.ticora.com)
for a three-year study on frontier basin resource and
production potential sponsored by the Gas Technology
Institute. "Our sample density was low. But you'll be amazed
at some of the regression that we've found across the general
region." An interpretative framework is developing to explain
observed gas content trends for the study, which is schedule
to be completed in August.
And then there's Arkansas. Because of its
nascence, resource definition is paramount to its Arkoma Basin
activity. According to Bill Prior with the Arkansas Geological Commission, about two-thirds of the Lower
Hartshorne coal volume is at a depth of 500 to 1,000 feet.
Faulting is extensive and a constant factor. For the
explorationists out there, Prior noted that "Lower Hartshorne
coal thickness is inversely related to thickness of the
underlying Hartshorne sand." Research projects are underway
defining CBM potential in the Desha Basin in southeastern
Arkansas.
|
CBM
Data
Sources Sidebar
Oklahoma
Save some time
by checking out the Oklahoma Geological Survey's coal and
coalbed methane Web page at
ogs.ou.edu/fossilfuels/coal.htm.
Aside from general information about Oklahoma's coal
resources, such as maps and stratigraphy, you can get links to
coal rank and production data, details about activity in the
Arkoma Basin and northeast Oklahoma shelf, and even a CBM
completion histogram. The links section will get you to all
major Oklahoma CBM data from national, government and academic
sources. And don't forget the coal database, where you can
search for CBM completions by county, bed, operator and other
useful categories.
Kansas
Interested in
the Western Interior Coal Region? A visit to the Kansas
Geological Survey's Coalbed Methane Project page at
www.kgs.ukans.edu/CBM/index.html is a must. Links to Kansas
and regional sites, plus nationwide and USGS endeavors alone
make the site worth a look. But its real beauty is
Kansas-specific reports, presentations and other information
available for download. From stratigraphy reports to isopach
maps to chemical analysis-there is a lot of good material.
Some great PowerPoint presentations are there for the taking,
too. Check back this fall to see the final results of the GTI
study on which Simon Testa presented at the Oklahoma show!
Arkansas
With Arkansas
unconventional gas production still short in the tooth, CBM
public data resources are more limited than in other states.
But it is a highly developed region conventionally, and the
Arkansas Geological Commission offers a nice, comprehensive
resource for Arkansas geology at
www.state.ar.us/agc/agc.htm, which includes extensive
research on stratigraphy, mineral resource estimates and maps,
as well as links to a number of useful other resources. Also,
the site offers an impressive list of maps and publications
available for purchase. |
Arkoma
CBM Development: Horizontal or Vertical?
The Hartshorne coal in Oklahoma's Arkoma
Basin has been brought to profitable fruition both
horizontally and vertically. And fans of both will find
assurance. Horizontal completions will reach a higher peak
rate sooner; but their initial decline is steeper. At the
four-year point, horizontal wells will produce about two and a
half times as much as a vertical well. Comparative ultimate
recoveries are yet to be determined, but cost data shared by
speakers indicated horizontal wells will cost from between two
and a half to four times higher than their vertical
counterparts. The perspective from which one approaches the
problem influences the answer regarding which approach is
best. As one speaker sagely advised, "Do what you know well."
El Paso Production Company is a powerhouse
of horizontal-well development in Oklahoma's Arkoma Basin. Curtis Matthews, senior
geologist, shared his horizontal-well success tips:
- Exercise good well planning
- Use an experienced directional driller
- Employ a good wellsite geologist
- Know the area geology (3-D visualization
helps)
- Have patience
And he should know. El Paso stays within a
4-ft-thick coal more than 90 percent of the time! This
includes when laterals encounter small faults of a few feet
displacement. Too small to be inferred from geological
information, El Paso's experience is to expect them. When
crossing a fault, one must get back in the coal quickly. But
do you go up or down? Matthews advised that one should go up
about 75 percent of the time. In addition, he notes that if
sand is right on top of the coal, it may be time to turn in
rather than endure the inevitable money pit that follows.
For vertical wells, minimalism has merit.
John Wendell of Wendell Consulting shared his expertise
developing Arkoma Basin vertical CBM wells. He stresses cost
containment across the board. He gave one example regarding
injection falloff testing to measure permeability. A vendor
can do this, but the costs can add up. So Wendell built his
own injection falloff-testing rig for roughly the cost of a
single service job. It did not have leather seats and a
sunroof, but it got him there; and it was a capital
expenditure.
Artificial lift is generally required to
keep water lifted off CBM wells. While conventional rod pumps
are common, there are disadvantages: volume limitations;
fines; maintenance costs, etc. Brian Weatherl of Source Rock
Energy Partners discussed two increasingly popular
alternatives. These include soap injection through capillary
strings using gas-powered pumps and a simplified gas lift.
Soap injection is cheaper than using rod pumps and lifts
similar capacity. And it is maintenance-friendly. Using a
simplified gas lift, setting a wellhead compressor and
injecting gas back down the annulus, also has an economic
advantage.
Great
Things
to be Achieved Unconventionally
The abundance of expertise in Oklahoma City
created the kind of enthusiasm that multiplies. "I certainly
enjoyed the presentations I saw that dealt with the Hartshorne
coal and horizontal drilling. They were done well and I
enjoyed being informed on horizontal drilling in the Arkoma
Basin," notes conference attendee Ed Butler, who is in charge
of engineering and planning for CDX Gas LLC. Butler agrees
that this technology will be important over the long haul.
John Dewey of Vintage Petroleum added: "I thought the
conference was very good; it was informative, the papers were
well done and the turn out was very good."
"I was very impressed with the technical
presentations and the technical knowledge presented," noted
Robert Gibson, one of three Questar Exploration and Production
attendees at the conference. He continues: "Anybody that came
could take something away-either an awestruck type of
perspective of how much tight gas sands, coalbed methane and
shale gas has contributed to increasing overall gas supply in
the United States or, at a more microscopic level, a good
understanding of the maturation process for these types of
reserves. We've been producing these things since the turn of
the last century. It's becoming more and more a part of our
domestic overall U.S. gas supply and its projected to increase
even more over time."
For further information, contact Lance Cole at
lcole@pttc.org.
|