|
DOE Research Goal
is Emission-Free Power Production
Table 1:
DOE Regional Sequestration Partnerships
Carbon Dioxide
Sequestration and Oil and Gas Recovery
Field Experience With
Oilfield CO2 Sequestration
Regional Strategies for CO2-EOR
Table 2:
Economically Recoverable Resource from CO2-EOR
|
Carbon Dioxide Storage:
Opportunities for the E&P Industry by Karl Lang with
Hart Energy Publishing, LP
Excerpts in
PTTC Network News, 1st Quarter 2005
Between the two extremes of the climate
change debate—denial that warming is taking place on one end
of the spectrum and hyperbolized consequences and demands for
drastic economic sacrifice at the other end—a middle ground is
forming that relies on technological innovation. The idea is
that a near-term solution could be to capture and permanently
store (sequester) carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions
from our largest and most concentrated streams (power plants,
refineries, etc) in geologic formations. This approach would
allow us to continue to use our most abundant and inexpensive
forms of energy (oil, gas and coal) while reducing carbon
dioxide's contribution to global warming. The US Department of
Energy sees this approach as one possible transition to an
eventual zero-emission, hydrogen-fueled future, and is deeply
involved in helping to develop the technologies needed to
enable subsurface geologic sequestration on a wide scale.
The oil and gas E&P industry can play a leading role in this
effort. Well acquainted with the injection of high-pressure
gases, the industry can provide a link between the capture of
CO2 for environmental benefit and the injection of
that CO2 for incremental oil or gas recovery. The
best near-term opportunity for safely and economically
sequestering CO2 may lie at the original source of
much of that nasty carbon, our own oilfields and coalfields.
Once cost effective techniques are developed to capture CO2,
there are significant volumes of economically recoverable oil
that can be produced in conjunction with its storage. Nearly
all of this resource lies in older fields, many of which are
now being operated by independent producers. This article
outlines the efforts underway and the estimated size of the
potential "prize" that might be producible under different
scenarios of technological growth and economic stimulation.
DOE Research Goal
is Emission-Free Power Production
The Department of Energy's (DOE) CO2 sequestration
program, managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory, is comprised of two
primary elements: a core R&D program and a regional
sequestration partnership program, both of which provide
support for the development of FutureGen, a $1 billion
industry/government partnership to design, build and operate a
coal gasification-based, nearly emission-free, coal-fired
electricity and hydrogen production plant.
The goal of the sequestration element of the
program is to enable captured CO2 to be separated and
permanently sequestered in depleted oil and gas reservoirs,
unmineable coal seams, deep saline aquifers, or other
formations. DOE also manages a variety of other research
designed to reduce emissions (e.g., power generation equipment
improvements) or to develop other means of disposal than
geologic sequestration (e.g., oceanic storage). Efforts in the core R&D program, underway
since 1998, focus on technologies for carbon capture,
sequestration, and storage as well as monitoring,
mitigation and verification. The regional partnership
initiative, announced in November 2002, is comprised of seven
partnerships of state agencies, universities, and
private companies that form a nationwide network to help
determine the best approaches for capturing and permanently
storing gases that can contribute to global climate change.
The partnerships include 216 organizations spanning 40 states,
three Indian nations, and four Canadian provinces.
Geographical differences in the use of fossil fuels and the
options for sequestration dictate that a regional approach is
necessary. The primary purposes of the regional partnerships
are to develop the framework needed to validate and
potentially deploy carbon sequestration technologies. These
partnerships will characterize each region's CO2 sources and
sinks, evaluate alternative sequestration approaches, study
regulatory and infrastructure requirements, and develop public
involvement and education mechanisms. The timeframe for this
effort is two years and DOE funding is roughly $2 MM per
partnership, with co-funding by the partners at about
one-third of the total. The largest representation of the oil
and gas E&P industry in the membership of the regional
partnerships is found in the West Coast and Southwest regions.
Eleven producing companies and five industry associations are
represented overall (see Table 1).
|
Table 1: DOE
Regional Sequestration Partnerships |
Region
|
States |
Lead
Organization
|
E&P Industry
Partners
|
Total Partners
|
Total
Funding
|
|
Midwest |
IN, KY, MI, MD, OH, PA, WV |
Battelle Mem. Inst.
|
BP
DTE Energy
|
31 |
$3.51MM |
|
Southeast |
AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC,
SC, TN, TX, VA |
Southern States
Energy Board
|
Advanced Resources Intl. |
13 |
$2 MM |
|
Southwest |
AZ, CO, KS, NE, NM, OK, TX,
UT, WY |
New Mexico Tech
|
Advanced Resources Intl.
Burlington Resources
ChevronTexaco ERTC
ChevronTexaco Permian BU
ConocoPhillips
KinderMorgan CO2
Marathon Oil Co.
Oxy Permian Ltd.
Yates Petroleum Corp. |
25 |
$2.15 MM |
|
West Coast |
AK, AZ, CA, NV, OR, WA |
California Energy
Commission
|
Amerada Hess
Eagle Operating, Inc.
Fischer Oil and Gas
North Dakota Pet. Council
|
47 |
$2.15 MM |
|
Big Sky |
ID, MT, SD, WY |
Montana State University
|
|
14 |
$2 MM |
|
Plains |
IA, MO, MN, ND, NE, MT, SD,
WI, WY |
University North Dakota
|
Amerada Hess
Eagle Operating, Inc.
Fischer Oil and Gas
North Dakota Pet. Council
|
29 |
$2.75 MM |
Midwest
Geologic
Sequestration Consortium |
IL, IN, KY |
Univ. Illinois and IL Geol.
Survey
|
IOGCC
KY Oil and Gas Assoc.
IN Oil and Gas Assoc.
IL Oil and Gas Assoc. |
21 |
$3.25 MM |
One product of the partnership program is an online GIS
database (www.natcarb.org)
that contains data on CO2 sources (refineries,
power plants, chemical plants, etc.) nationwide. The map
layers also depict oil and gas fields, Federal lands, aquifer
areas, and a wealth of information (you will need a little
patience and a high-speed internet connection). Individual CO2
emissions sources can be clicked on to reveal plant
information. The database is best populated in the Illinois
Basin as far as oil and gas fields, but the online system is
being added to on a regular basis.
According to Robert Finley of the University of Illinois, the
Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (www.sequestration.org)
has submitted a proposal to DOE for Phase II of the
partnership program that includes potential field tests with
10 operators in the Illinois Basin. The list of companies
included: Bretagne GP, Continental Resources, Gallagher
Drilling, Covington Oil & Gas, Shakespeare Oil, Murvin Oil,
Oelze Production, Team Energy, and Howard Energy. A utility,
Ameren Corp., also proposed two coalbed methane injection
tests. If this Phase II project is approved, only four field
tests will be selected. However, the level of interest from
independent producers was strong. DOE is currently evaluating
all of the Phase II proposals received from the partnerships.
Carbon Dioxide
Sequestration and Oil and Gas Recovery
CO2 can, of course, be injected into depleted oil
reservoirs as part of an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process.
This has been successfully carried out for decades in a number
of Permian Basin carbonate reservoirs, primarily using
purchased CO2 produced and piped from naturally
occurring reservoirs in Colorado and New Mexico. The driver
here is recovery of a portion
of the 30 to 40 percent of the reservoirs' oil
remaining in place after secondary waterflood
operations, not CO2 sequestration. Supercritical CO2
can become miscible with the oil, acting as a solvent to
reduce residual saturation. Naturally, EOR operations have
been focused on minimizing the amount of CO2 that
remains sequestered per barrel of oil recovered (about 2000
scf or less per barrel), as this CO2 is a purchased
injectant.
Alternatively, CO2
could be injected into a reservoir that is still producing
primary oil but which is nearing the end of its producing
life. A credit for CO2 storage would shift the
economics of enhanced oil recovery and alter field practices
to optimizing CO2 storage. Use of depleting oil
reservoirs amenable to CO2 EOR as a sequestration
option, could provide a value-added benefit in terms of
incremental revenue from enhanced oil production which could
partially offset the cost of CO2 capture, which
currently is not insignificant.
Captured carbon dioxide could also be injected and sequestered
in depleted gas reservoirs. The fact that gas was trapped in
such reservoirs over geologic time supports the notion that
they are safe repositories for carbon dioxide over the long
term. In many cases the infrastructure for injection (surface
piping compressors, wells) still exists.
The CO2 storage capacity of domestic oil and gas
formations has been estimated at roughly 150 billion metric
tons of CO2, or roughly 30 years worth of current
U.S. emissions (ARI, 2003). Depleting oil reservoirs can't
meet all potential CO2 sequestration needs, but
they could provide an early opportunity for sequestration at
relatively low cost. Some of DOE's core R&D is investigating
trapping mechanisms for CO2 and developing
reservoir management strategies that simultaneously maximize
CO2 sequestration and oil recovery.
Another option also aligned with the oil and
gas industry is sequestration in coal seams that are too deep
or too thin to be mined economically but are candidates for
methane extraction. Primary "coal bed methane" recovery
methods, dewatering and depressurization, leave a fair amount
of the methane in the reservoir. Enhanced methane recovery can be achieved by sweeping the coal
seam with nitrogen or CO2. The CO2
preferentially adsorbs onto the surface of the coal, releasing
the methane. Two to three molecules of CO2 are
adsorbed for each molecule of methane released. The maximum
domestic capacity for CO2 sequestration in coal
seams has been estimated at 90 billion metric tons CO2,
40 billion metric tons of which is in Alaska (ARI, 2003). Like
depleting oil reservoirs, unmineable coal seams could be a
good early alternative for CO2 storage. One
potential problem however, is coal swelling. It has been
observed that when coal adsorbs CO2 it swells in
volume, restricting the flow of CO2 into and the
flow of methane out of the coal. Work is underway toward
minimizing these negative effects.
In
addition, the potential for CO2 storage in
formations saturated with brine is enormous compared to oil
reservoirs and coal beds and potentially could contain
hundreds of year's worth of CO2 emissions. However,
much less is known about injecting into saline formations than
is known about injecting into oil reservoirs and coal seams. A
portion of DOE's core R&D is focused on improving our
understanding of these saline formations.
Field Experience With
Oilfield CO2 Sequestration
Two large CO2 sequestration projects have been
underway for a number of years: an EOR project at Weyburn Oil
Field in Canada and injection into a deep saline formation in
the Sleipner Gas Field in the North Sea. In addition, a
relatively small-scale (one days' worth of CO2 from
an average coal-fired power plant) field test supported by the
DOE program is also underway.
The Weyburn project began in 1999. It involves the transport
of CO2 through a 202-mile pipeline from a coal
gasification plant north of Beulah, ND to the Weyburn oil
field near Regina Saskatchewan. Before building the pipeline,
the Dakota Gasification Company released most of the CO2
into the atmosphere. The CO2 (96 % pure) is
compressed to 2200 psi before being delivered to the pipeline.
At Weyburn, the gas is injected into the producing zone, a
100-ft thick Mississippian carbonate at a depth of about 4700
ft. The 70-square mile field area contains more than 1000
wells. On a daily basis, about 100 MMcf (5000 metric
tons) of CO2 are transported and injected. As of
March 2004, about 106 Bcf of CO2 had been injected
and over the project's lifetime a total of 466 Bcf (22 million
metric tons) will be sequestered. The operator, EnCana
Corporation, estimates that an additional 130 million barrels
of oil will be recovered over the next 30 years as a result of
the CO2 injection.
The
world's first CO2 capture and storage project
actually began in 1996 in the Sleipner gas field offshore
Norway. The operator (Statoil) processes the produced gas to
reduce its CO2 content from 9% to 2.5% before sale.
If the extracted CO2 were released to the
atmosphere, Statoil would be required to pay a tax of about
US$45 per metric ton, so the company injects the CO2
into a regional saline aquifer via a single, highly deviated
injection well. Over the past nine years the Sleipner
operation has injected over 7 million metric tons of CO2
and the operational plan is to continue to inject for another
15 years. The saline aquifer has the potential to sequester
600 billion tons of CO2.
A more recent injection project funded by
DOE (part of the core R&D program mentioned earlier) is
underway in the South Liberty oil field northeast of Houston.
The brine-filled injection zone in this field is a sandstone
zone within the Frio formation, at a depth of about 5000 ft,
on the flank of a salt dome. The site was selected due to its
proximity to a large concentration of power plants, refineries
and chemical manufacturing plants that emit CO2.
The Gulf Coast region emits roughly 520 million metric tons of
CO2 each year. The Frio sands in this region have
been estimated to be capable of storing between 200 and 358
billion metric tons. For this project, injection of about 3000
metric tons from a nearby refinery took place over a
three-week period. A number of monitoring, diagnostic and
modeling activities have taken place or are underway.
The project aims to test these tools and
techniques for characterizing a CO2 injection
operation, as well as to demonstrate that CO2 can
be safely injected and securely stored.
Regional Strategies for CO2-EOR
Anticipating a time when economics will support the
simultaneous capture and storage of CO22 and the
enhancement of oil production, DOE has undertaken a fresh look
at the potential for enhanced oil recovery from CO2 injection
in the nation's older reservoirs. Using the CO2-PROPHET
model developed by Texaco for DOE, Advanced Resources
International (ARI) evaluated major reservoirs in six regions
of the country: Oklahoma, onshore Gulf Coast, Illinois,
onshore California, offshore Louisiana and Alaska. The model
was used to determine the economic (>15% ROR BFIT) resource.
For each region, the analysts evaluated alternative oil
recovery strategies and scenarios. The first scenario assumed
CO2-EOR technology as applied in the past
(Traditional Practices Scenario). The second scenario assumed
that all of the lessons of past CO2-EOR technology
are applied using state-of-the-art technology and oil price
averages $25/Bbl, but CO2 supply costs remain high
at a per MCF cost of about 5% of oil price (State-of-the-Art
Scenario). The third scenario examines how the potential for
CO2-EOR could be increased through a strategy
involving state tax reductions, federal tax credits, royalty
relief and/or higher oil prices that would together be
equivalent to a $10 per barrel lift in oil price (to $35)
received by the producer (Risk Mitigation Scenario). In the
fourth scenario low-cost CO2 is assumed to be
available at a per Mcf cost of about 2% of oil price (kept at
$35/Bbl), from existing natural sources and industrial sources
via CO2 capture technologies (Ample Supplies of CO2
Scenario).
The results for the four areas of interest
to most independent producers (onshore lower-48 states) show
that at reasonable long-term oil prices of $25-$35 per barrel,
there are substantial potential recoverable reserves
obtainable from CO2-EOR if a reliable, reasonably
priced source of CO2 can be found (Table
2).
|
Table
2: Economically Recoverable Resource from CO2-EOR |
|
Region |
Fraction of Region’s
EUR Evaluated |
Economically Recoverable Resource
by Scenario (MM Bbls) |
|
|
State-of-the-Art |
Risk
Mitigation |
Ample CO2
Supplies |
| Oklahoma |
60.5% |
2890 |
4560 |
4740 |
| California |
90% |
1830 |
3500 |
3980 |
| Illinois |
68.7% |
370 |
470 |
470 |
| Gulf Coast
|
58.5% |
1860 |
4330 |
3570* |
| Total |
|
6950 |
9860 |
12,760 |
| *Ample Supply Scenario
includes $25 oil rather than $35 as the others |
Given that some believe that oil prices
might move considerably higher than that range, and that up
to 30% of the total resource was not evaluated, these totals
could be conservative. On the other hand, the lack of
existing CO2
gathering and distribution infrastructure in these areas will
make it costly to deliver CO2 at prices in the 2 to
5% of oil price range, even if new technology lowers the cost
of CO2 capture and separation. Some sort of
favorable tax treatment could help to alleviate this risk.
So, while the idea of widespread application of CO2-EOR
outside of the traditional Permian Basin area may seem
farfetched, a radical change in the cost of capturing EOR-ready
CO2 or a radical shift in the value assigned to
removing CO2 from the atmosphere could change the
picture. The resource remains there, waiting for the right set
of circumstances.
Note: This article
was prepared with input from three primary sources: The NETL
Carbon Sequestration website at
www.netl.doe.gov/, an article by Kamel
Bennaceur (and others) in the Autumn 2004 issue of
Schlumberger's Oilfield Review available at
www.slb.com/, and draft copies of ARI's
reports: Basin Oriented Strategies for CO2 Enhanced
Oil Recovery. These reports are expected to be published in
the near future and will be available on the DOE website at
www.doe.gov/.
|