Petroleum Technology Transfer Council

PEOPLE AND CONNECTIONS
Shortening the Technology Application Life Cycle

Technology—The Engine That Drives O&G Production




DOE Research Goal is Emission-Free Power Production

Table 1: DOE Regional Sequestration Partnerships

Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Oil and Gas Recovery

Field Experience With Oilfield CO2 Sequestration

Regional Strategies for CO2-EOR

Table 2: Economically Recoverable Resource from CO2-EOR

 

Carbon Dioxide Storage: Opportunities for the E&P Industry
by Karl Lang with Hart Energy Publishing, LP
Excerpts in PTTC Network News, 1st Quarter 2005

Between the two extremes of the climate change debate—denial that warming is taking place on one end of the spectrum and hyperbolized consequences and demands for drastic economic sacrifice at the other end—a middle ground is forming that relies on technological innovation. The idea is that a near-term solution could be to capture and permanently store (sequester) carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from our largest and most concentrated streams (power plants, refineries, etc) in geologic formations. This approach would allow us to continue to use our most abundant and inexpensive forms of energy (oil, gas and coal) while reducing carbon dioxide's contribution to global warming. The US Department of Energy sees this approach as one possible transition to an eventual zero-emission, hydrogen-fueled future, and is deeply involved in helping to develop the technologies needed to enable subsurface geologic sequestration on a wide scale.

The oil and gas E&P industry can play a leading role in this effort. Well acquainted with the injection of high-pressure gases, the industry can provide a link between the capture of CO2 for environmental benefit and the injection of that CO2 for incremental oil or gas recovery. The best near-term opportunity for safely and economically sequestering CO2 may lie at the original source of much of that nasty carbon, our own oilfields and coalfields.

Once cost effective techniques are developed to capture CO2, there are significant volumes of economically recoverable oil that can be produced in conjunction with its storage. Nearly all of this resource lies in older fields, many of which are now being operated by independent producers. This article outlines the efforts underway and the estimated size of the potential "prize" that might be producible under different scenarios of technological growth and economic stimulation.

DOE Research Goal is Emission-Free Power Production
The Department of Energy's (DOE) CO2 sequestration program, managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory, is comprised of two primary elements: a core R&D  program and a regional sequestration partnership program, both of which provide support for the development of FutureGen, a $1 billion industry/government partnership to design, build and operate a coal gasification-based, nearly emission-free, coal-fired electricity and hydrogen production plant.

The goal of the sequestration element of the program is to enable captured CO2 to be separated and permanently sequestered in depleted oil and gas reservoirs, unmineable coal seams, deep saline aquifers, or other formations. DOE also manages a variety of other research designed to reduce emissions (e.g., power generation equipment improvements) or to develop other means of disposal than geologic sequestration (e.g., oceanic storage). Efforts in the core R&D program, underway since 1998, focus on technologies for carbon capture, sequestration, and storage as well as  monitoring, mitigation and verification. The regional partnership initiative, announced in November 2002, is comprised of seven partnerships of state agencies,  universities, and private companies that form a nationwide network to help determine the best approaches for capturing and permanently storing gases that can contribute to global climate change. The partnerships include 216 organizations spanning 40 states, three Indian nations, and four Canadian provinces. Geographical differences in the use of fossil fuels and the options for sequestration dictate that a regional approach is necessary. The primary purposes of the regional partnerships are to develop the framework needed to validate and potentially deploy carbon sequestration technologies. These partnerships will characterize each region's CO2 sources and sinks, evaluate alternative sequestration approaches, study regulatory and infrastructure requirements, and develop public involvement and education mechanisms. The timeframe for this effort is two years and DOE funding is roughly $2 MM per partnership, with co-funding by the partners at about one-third of the total. The largest representation of the oil and gas E&P industry in the membership of the regional partnerships is found in the West Coast and Southwest regions. Eleven producing companies and five industry associations are represented overall (see Table 1).
 

Table 1: DOE Regional Sequestration Partnerships
Region
 
States Lead
Organization
 
E&P Industry
Partners
 
Total Partners
 
Total
Funding
 
Midwest IN, KY, MI, MD, OH, PA, WV Battelle Mem. Inst.
 
BP
DTE Energy
 
31 $3.51MM
Southeast AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, TX, VA Southern States
Energy Board
 
Advanced Resources Intl. 13 $2 MM
Southwest AZ, CO, KS, NE, NM, OK, TX, UT, WY New Mexico Tech
 
Advanced Resources Intl.
Burlington Resources
ChevronTexaco ERTC
ChevronTexaco Permian BU
ConocoPhillips
KinderMorgan CO2
Marathon Oil Co.
Oxy Permian Ltd.
Yates Petroleum Corp.
25 $2.15 MM
West Coast AK, AZ, CA, NV, OR, WA California Energy
Commission
 
Amerada Hess
Eagle Operating, Inc.
Fischer Oil and Gas
North Dakota Pet. Council

 
47 $2.15 MM
Big Sky ID, MT, SD, WY Montana State University
 
  14 $2 MM
Plains IA, MO, MN, ND, NE, MT, SD, WI, WY University North Dakota
 
Amerada Hess
Eagle Operating, Inc.
Fischer Oil and Gas
North Dakota Pet. Council
 
29 $2.75 MM
Midwest
Geologic
Sequestration Consortium
IL, IN, KY Univ. Illinois and IL Geol. Survey
 
IOGCC
KY Oil and Gas Assoc.
IN Oil and Gas Assoc.
IL Oil and Gas Assoc.
21 $3.25 MM

One product of the partnership program is an online GIS database (www.natcarb.org) that contains data on CO2 sources (refineries, power plants, chemical plants, etc.) nationwide. The map layers also depict oil and gas fields, Federal lands, aquifer areas, and a wealth of information (you will need a little patience and a high-speed internet connection). Individual CO2 emissions sources can be clicked on to reveal plant information. The database is best populated in the Illinois Basin as far as oil and gas fields, but the online system is being added to on a regular basis.

According to Robert Finley of the University of Illinois, the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (www.sequestration.org) has submitted a proposal to DOE for Phase II of the partnership program that includes potential field tests with 10 operators in the Illinois Basin. The list of companies included: Bretagne GP, Continental Resources, Gallagher Drilling, Covington Oil & Gas, Shakespeare Oil, Murvin Oil, Oelze Production, Team Energy, and Howard Energy. A utility, Ameren Corp., also proposed two coalbed methane injection tests. If this Phase II project is approved, only four field tests will be selected. However, the level of interest from independent producers was strong. DOE is currently evaluating all of the Phase II proposals received from the partnerships.

Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Oil and Gas Recovery
CO2 can, of course, be injected into depleted oil reservoirs as part of an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process. This has been successfully carried out for decades in a number of Permian Basin carbonate reservoirs, primarily using purchased CO2 produced and piped from naturally occurring reservoirs in Colorado and New Mexico. The driver here is recovery of a portion

of the 30 to 40 percent of the reservoirs' oil remaining in place after secondary  waterflood operations, not CO2 sequestration. Supercritical CO2 can become miscible with the oil, acting as a solvent to reduce residual saturation. Naturally, EOR operations have been focused on minimizing the amount of CO2 that remains sequestered per barrel of oil recovered (about 2000 scf or less per barrel), as this CO2 is a purchased injectant.

Alternatively, CO2 could be injected into a reservoir that is still producing primary oil but which is nearing the end of its producing life. A credit for CO2 storage would shift the economics of enhanced oil recovery and alter field practices to optimizing CO2 storage. Use of depleting oil reservoirs amenable to CO2 EOR as a sequestration option, could provide a value-added benefit in terms of incremental revenue from enhanced oil production which could partially offset the cost of CO2 capture, which currently is not insignificant.

Captured carbon dioxide could also be injected and sequestered in depleted gas reservoirs. The fact that gas was trapped in such reservoirs over geologic time supports the notion that they are safe repositories for carbon dioxide over the long term. In many cases the infrastructure for injection (surface piping compressors, wells) still exists.

The CO2 storage capacity of domestic oil and gas formations has been estimated at roughly 150 billion metric tons of CO2, or roughly 30 years worth of current U.S. emissions (ARI, 2003). Depleting oil reservoirs can't meet all potential CO2 sequestration needs, but they could provide an early opportunity for sequestration at relatively low cost. Some of DOE's core R&D is investigating trapping mechanisms for CO2 and developing reservoir management strategies that simultaneously maximize CO2 sequestration and oil recovery.

Another option also aligned with the oil and gas industry is sequestration in coal seams that are too deep or too thin to be mined economically but are candidates for methane extraction. Primary "coal bed methane" recovery methods, dewatering and depressurization, leave a fair amount of the methane in the reservoir. Enhanced methane recovery can be achieved by sweeping the coal seam with nitrogen or CO2. The CO2 preferentially adsorbs onto the surface of the coal, releasing the methane. Two to three molecules of CO2 are adsorbed for each molecule of methane released. The maximum domestic capacity for CO2 sequestration in coal seams has been estimated at 90 billion metric tons CO2, 40 billion metric tons of which is in Alaska (ARI, 2003). Like depleting oil reservoirs, unmineable coal seams could be a good early alternative for CO2 storage. One potential problem however, is coal swelling. It has been observed that when coal adsorbs CO2 it swells in volume, restricting the flow of CO2 into and the flow of methane out of the coal. Work is underway toward minimizing these negative effects.

In addition, the potential for CO2 storage in formations saturated with brine is enormous compared to oil reservoirs and coal beds and potentially could contain hundreds of year's worth of CO2 emissions. However, much less is known about injecting into saline formations than is known about injecting into oil reservoirs and coal seams. A portion of DOE's core R&D is focused on improving our understanding of these saline formations.

Field Experience With Oilfield CO2 Sequestration
Two large CO2 sequestration projects have been underway for a number of years: an EOR project at Weyburn Oil Field in Canada and injection into a deep saline formation in the Sleipner Gas Field in the North Sea. In addition, a relatively small-scale (one days' worth of CO2 from an average coal-fired power plant) field test supported by the DOE program is also underway.

The Weyburn project began in 1999. It involves the transport of CO2 through a 202-mile pipeline from a coal gasification plant north of Beulah, ND to the Weyburn oil field near Regina Saskatchewan. Before building the pipeline, the Dakota Gasification Company released most of the CO2 into the atmosphere. The CO2 (96 % pure) is compressed to 2200 psi before being delivered to the pipeline. At Weyburn, the gas is injected into the producing zone, a 100-ft thick Mississippian carbonate at a depth of about 4700 ft. The 70-square mile field area contains more than 1000 wells.

On a daily basis, about 100 MMcf (5000 metric tons) of CO2 are transported and injected. As of March 2004, about 106 Bcf of CO2 had been injected and over the project's lifetime a total of 466 Bcf (22 million metric tons) will be sequestered. The operator, EnCana Corporation, estimates that an additional 130 million barrels of oil will be recovered over the next 30 years as a result of the CO2 injection.

The world's first CO2 capture and storage project actually began in 1996 in the Sleipner gas field offshore Norway. The operator (Statoil) processes the produced gas to reduce its CO2 content from 9% to 2.5% before sale. If the extracted CO2 were released to the atmosphere, Statoil would be required to pay a tax of about US$45 per metric ton, so the company injects the CO2 into a regional saline aquifer via a single, highly deviated injection well. Over the past nine years the Sleipner operation has injected over 7 million metric tons of CO2 and the operational plan is to continue to inject for another 15 years. The saline aquifer has the potential to sequester 600 billion tons of CO2.

A more recent injection project funded by DOE (part of the core R&D program mentioned earlier) is underway in the South Liberty oil field northeast of Houston. The brine-filled injection zone in this field is a sandstone zone within the Frio formation, at a depth of about 5000 ft, on the flank of a salt dome. The site was selected due to its proximity to a large concentration of power plants, refineries and chemical manufacturing plants that emit CO2. The Gulf Coast region emits roughly 520 million metric tons of CO2 each year. The Frio sands in this region have been estimated to be capable of storing between 200 and 358 billion metric tons. For this project, injection of about 3000 metric tons from a nearby refinery took place over a three-week period. A number of monitoring, diagnostic and modeling activities have taken place or are underway.

The project aims to test these tools and techniques for characterizing a CO2 injection operation, as well as to demonstrate that CO2 can be safely injected and securely stored.

Regional Strategies for CO2-EOR
Anticipating a time when economics will support the simultaneous capture and storage of CO22 and the enhancement of oil production, DOE has undertaken a fresh look at the potential for enhanced oil recovery from CO2 injection in the nation's older reservoirs. Using the CO2-PROPHET model developed by Texaco for DOE, Advanced Resources International (ARI) evaluated major reservoirs in six regions of the country: Oklahoma, onshore Gulf Coast, Illinois, onshore California, offshore Louisiana and Alaska. The model was used to determine the economic (>15% ROR BFIT) resource. For each region, the analysts evaluated alternative oil recovery strategies and scenarios. The first scenario assumed CO2-EOR technology as applied in the past (Traditional Practices Scenario). The second scenario assumed that all of the lessons of past CO2-EOR technology are applied using state-of-the-art technology and oil price averages $25/Bbl, but CO2 supply costs remain high at a per MCF cost of about 5% of oil price (State-of-the-Art Scenario). The third scenario examines how the potential for CO2-EOR could be increased through a strategy involving state tax reductions, federal tax credits, royalty relief and/or higher oil prices that would together be equivalent to a $10 per barrel lift in oil price (to $35) received by the producer (Risk Mitigation Scenario). In the fourth scenario low-cost CO2 is assumed to be available at a per Mcf cost of about 2% of oil price (kept at $35/Bbl), from existing natural sources and industrial sources via CO2 capture technologies (Ample Supplies of CO2 Scenario).

The results for the four areas of interest to most independent producers (onshore lower-48 states) show that at reasonable long-term oil prices of $25-$35 per barrel, there are substantial potential recoverable reserves obtainable from CO2-EOR if a reliable, reasonably priced source of CO2 can be found (Table 2).
 

 Table 2: Economically Recoverable Resource from CO2-EOR

Region Fraction of Region’s
EUR Evaluated
Economically Recoverable Resource
by Scenario (MM Bbls)




 



 
State-of-the-Art Risk Mitigation Ample CO2 Supplies
Oklahoma 60.5% 2890 4560 4740
California 90% 1830 3500 3980
Illinois 68.7% 370 470 470
Gulf Coast 58.5% 1860 4330 3570*
Total   6950 9860 12,760
*Ample Supply Scenario includes $25 oil rather than $35 as the others

Given that some believe that oil prices might move considerably higher than that range, and that up to 30% of the total resource was not evaluated, these totals could be conservative. On the other hand, the lack of existing CO2 gathering and distribution infrastructure in these areas will make it costly to deliver CO2 at prices in the 2 to 5% of oil price range, even if new technology lowers the cost of CO2 capture and separation. Some sort of favorable tax treatment could help to alleviate this risk.

So, while the idea of widespread application of CO2-EOR outside of the traditional Permian Basin area may seem farfetched, a radical change in the cost of capturing EOR-ready CO2 or a radical shift in the value assigned to removing CO2 from the atmosphere could change the picture. The resource remains there, waiting for the right set of circumstances.

Note: This article was prepared with input from three primary sources: The NETL Carbon Sequestration website at www.netl.doe.gov/, an article by Kamel Bennaceur (and others) in the Autumn 2004 issue of Schlumberger's Oilfield Review available at www.slb.com/, and draft copies of ARI's reports: Basin Oriented Strategies for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery. These reports are expected to be published in the near future and will be available on the DOE website at www.doe.gov/.

Disclaimer: No specific application of products or services is endorsed by PTTC. Reasonable steps are taken to ensure the reliability of sources for information that PTTC disseminates; individuals and institutions are solely responsible for the consequences of its use.