|
|
Carbon
Dioxide: Curse or Blessing?
by Dwight
Rychel, P.E., Petroleum Technology Transfer Council
Excerpts in
PTTC Network News, 2nd Quarter 2006
The answer to that question very much depends on who you ask. And increasingly, the person being asked will have a strong opinion. For two centuries or more, scientists have been measuring an increasing level of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, beginning in the 19th century as industrial nations began burning increasing amounts of carbon-based fuel. There are indications of temperature increases, but there is vigorous debate within the scientific community whether this is global warming due to CO2 or due to cycles as observed in geologic time. In the same time frame, petroleum engineers and geoscientists have been advancing and developing the technology to use CO2 from natural sources, such as the geological domes in the southwest to squeeze up to 20% more oil out of mature water-flooded reservoirs. These CO2 floods are now contributing over 4% of the domestic oil supply. Environmentalists and oil companies have a long history of conflicting interests and it's no small irony that the technology developed by the oil companies is viewed as one of the front-line means of reducing the growth of greenhouse gases. This technology, the long-term sequestration of CO2 in geological formations, has brought about an alignment of oil company and environmental interests. This article will look at recent events and research efforts in CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR), sequestration, where the CO2 comes from, how it can be reduced and what role the U.S. and other governments are playing.
This new partnership was very evident at the 11th Annual CO2 Flooding Conference and Carbon Management Workshop held in Midland, Texas, December 6 - 9. (Go to
www.spe-pb.org for agendas and presentation downloads). This conference has grown from a local operations meeting, spawned by the DOE Reservoir Class field demonstration program among the Permian Basin operators, to a global workshop on CO2 flooding technology and carbon management. The December meeting attracted over 400 people from 10 countries and 20 states and represented 135 different companies, laboratories and
government agencies. Speakers and attendees
included, as one would expect, engineers and
scientists, but also lawyers,
government representatives, emission traders,
bankers and environmental interests. Much of the information in this article can
be found in the 45 presentations made in the two sessions. The body of knowledge
and entities engaged in CO2 flooding and sequestration is enormous. At the
May 2 - 5, 2005 4th Annual DOE conference on Carbon Capture &
Sequestration, there were 130 oral papers and 60 posters from 18 countries. The
bi-annual SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium (www.IOR2006.org) has multiple sessions on the topic. The DOE has formed seven regional partnerships comprised of 240 organizations spanning 40 states, three Indian nations and four Canadian provinces to pursue the technology of capture, separation and sequestration of CO2 and is sponsoring over 85 active research projects. PTTC has sponsored CO2 workshops in Illinois, New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Mississippi and California. (www.pttc.org/solutions.htm)
Speakers in Midland cited a number of recent events that demonstrate the convergence of the market for commodity CO2 for use in enhanced oil recovery and sequestered CO2 and resulting tradable offsets:
With Russia's ratification of the Kyoto Accord, it became legally binding, requiring a 5.2% reduction in GHG emissions from the industrialized world
- Early trading of CO2 emission credits between Kyoto and non-Kyoto countries begins in $25/ton range
- New Jersey declares CO2 a pollutant
- U.S. commodity market for manufactured CO2 reaches $30/ton
- Canada begins developing cap and trade program
- AEP and other large Northeast Utilities set emission reduction targets—4% in 2006 over 1998
Peter Fusaro of Global Change Associates and Michael Moore of CO2 Global commented on the growing market for the trading of GHG credits, similar to the U.S. markets for NOx and SOx. This activity is taking place within the Kyoto countries and does not yet include credits for CO2 EOR. However, trading between Kyoto and non-Kyoto countries is emerging but it is very thin and illiquid. The market farthest along is the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) which commenced on January 1, 2005. The scheme will work on a "Cap and Trade" basis, with EU member state governments setting the cap for all installations. Early trades for current periods have been in the €30/ton range ($35.90 US at today's conversion). Forecasts for EU ETS range from $20 to $50/ton and are expected to settle around $30/ton. This would suggest that if an operator can capture and sequester an emitted MCF of CO2, they could receive a credit of just under $2 when the protocols are finalized and the markets mature.

Figure 1:
Anthropogenic CO2 Sources, Courtesy Melzer Consulting
Where Does CO2 Come From?
By a large margin, (700 billion tons worldwide, or 97%), CO2 emissions come from natural sources: animals, volcanoes and other uncontrollable sources. For the last several hundred years—until the 20th century—the earth, primarily through plants and the oceans, has absorbed those emissions, keeping the amount in the air relatively constant. Loss of vegetation and increasing use of carbon fuels, however, is tipping the balance. In the U.S., anthropogenic (man-made) CO2 emissions from stationary sources are estimated at 2,000 million tons/year (the volumetric conversion is approximately 17 MCF/ton). Transportation would add half that again. The largest source is from electrical generation, nearly half of the stationary total. A single 750 MW coal plant can generate as much as 5 million tons/year. Overall, a relatively small fraction of the sources are of a concentration, size and location to be economically available for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). In their Midland presentation, Excel Energy, a large electric utility, estimated the cost to capture the CO2 from today's coal plants at $50 to $75/ton, plus transportation costs.
In 2003, seven industrial plants were supplying 5.6 million tons/yr of CO2 to EOR projects in Texas, Wyoming, Oklahoma, and Saskatchewan (from the Great Plains coal gasification plant in North Dakota). Recent expansions in Wyoming will increase that total to 8 million tons/year, still less than 4% of the stationary emissions. And as Steve Melzer of Melzer Consulting pointed out in the conference, these types of industrial sources constitute the "low hanging fruit" inasmuch as they represent significant volumes, require little separation processing and are in the general area of oil production. (Figure 1) The next tier (and slightly more expensive) branches would include ethanol plants, refineries and cement plants. More expensive yet, would be pulverized coal plant electrical generation flue stream capture and lastly, vehicle exhaust.
Because of the cost of capture and transportation of CO2 from
anthropogenic sources, most of the CO2 for the 70 current and planned CO2 floods comes from several large domes of naturally-occurring CO2 in Colorado, New
Mexico and Mississippi. An extensive pipeline system supplies the
major projects in the Permian Basin. Unlike the gas available from anthropogenic
sources, gas from the Southwest domes is delivered in the $0.75 to $1.50/MCF range. According to the supply panel discussions at the conference, these three domes supplying projects in the Permian basin have reserves of 18.5 TCF and are delivering gas at their capacity, 1.4 BCF/day, which equates to a 50 year supply at the current rate. Any future capacity expansions will be relatively large and expensive projects and would need to have a committed market, creating a bit of a chicken and egg dilemma.
Where is the CO2 Going?
More to the point where is it not going? Or where could it go? As discussed above, 80% of the incremental oil produced by CO2 flooding comes from the four natural CO2 domes due to cost and proximity to suitable fields in the Permian basin and Mississippi, which does not help the imbalance of emissions. It effectively takes the CO2 out of one geological formation and puts it into another. The most recent Oil and Gas Journal survey of enhanced oil recovery projects (April 12, 2004 - to be updated in April 2006 in conjunction with the SPE IOR Symposium in Tulsa) shows 68 CO2 projects. Collectively, they produce nearly 240 thousand barrels/day and are estimated to sequester around 2 BCF of CO2 daily (8 MCF per barrel produced). (Figure 2) Fifty-three of those projects are located in the Permian basin and produce over 80% of the CO2 EOR barrels. A remarkable statistic was recently reported
by Melzer Consulting: the cumulative Permian Basin CO2 EOR production has reached the billion barrel mark in the fall of 2005, since the onset of production in 1974. And this growth has been steady
through times of $20 oil and $40 oil, with around two new
projects added each year, as shown in Figure 3.
But with the Permian CO2 pipelines running at capacity, the most recent growth has occurred elsewhere, notably in the Denbury East Mississippi pipeline expansion from the Jackson dome to three new CO2 floods and Anadarko's new projects from the Shute Creek gas plant in Wyoming. The Denbury Free State Pipeline began construction in August 2005 and is scheduled for completion in July 2006. It will run 86 miles at a cost of $50 million, plus another $40 million for the three facilities. It is designed to deliver 270 MMCF/day without compression, up to 450 MMCF/day with compression. The Mississippi CO2 floods are somewhat different than those in the Permian Basin in that two of them are quite deep, around 12,000 feet, smaller and higher injection pressures, around 3,150 PSI. The other notable new project is Anadarko's expansion in the Powder River Basin. They have constructed a new 125 mile CO2 line from the Baroil terminus in central Wyoming to the Sussex and Salt Creek fields located to the east and a 33 mile extension to the Monell field in Southern Wyoming at a cost of over $1.2 billion. These three fields are currently producing 20,000 Barrels/day and are expected to peak at 50,000 Barrels/day in 2010. They sequester 175,000 MCF/day of the current Shute Creek plant's 240,000 MCF/day capacity. Anadarko is evaluating a further expansion to the north of Salt Creek to other Powder River fields and ExxonMobil is evaluating an expansion of CO2 capture and compression capability at the Shute Creek LaBarge gas plant.

Figure 2 - U.S. CO2 EOR
Production, Courtesy Melzer Consulting
In spite of the steady growth of
projects and production, today's floods barely scratch the
surface of the potential.
A recent report prepared by Advanced Resources International (ARI) for the DOE screened the major U.S. oil producing basins and suggested that as much as 89 billion additional barrels could be recoverable with today's "state-of-the-art" technology, which presumes, among other things, sufficient volumes of CO2 available at prices comparable to today's Permian Basin prices. To even begin to access those reserves a number of drivers need to work together: new technology to capture and separate the CO2 cheaply, government tax credits for sequestration projects and emission credits for verifiable reductions. An earlier ARI report projected the potential from CO2 EOR production growing from 250 MBarrels/day today to 2,000 MBarrels/day by 2050, sequestering over 400 million tons/year of CO2.
Clearly, based on the numbers above, this convergence of oil producers and environmental interests must result in inexpensive anthropogenic CO2 being available at the field to continue the growth of this source of domestic oil. A number of other (non-EOR) options for disposing of the CO2 once it is
captured are being researched, including geological formations, terrestrial and
the deep ocean. In terms of technical feasibility and timeframe for development,
disposal into geological formations (depleted oil and gas, unmineable coal
and saline) is closest to reality. Of those options, the technology for long
term storage in oil reservoirs already has a 30± year history and will be the first option. The DOE estimates that oil reservoirs in the lower
onshore 48could hold 40 - 50 billion tons, gas another 80 - 100, coal 15 - 20 and deep aquifers between 5 and 500 billion tons.
Going Forward—DOE and Energy Industry
Presentations at the Midland conference by ARI, U.S. Department of Energy and a number of others drive home the fact that the technically recoverable oil using the latest CO2 flooding technologies is enormous. With reservoir characterization, monitoring, horizontal drilling and pattern modification and other state-of-the-art technologies, the 240,000 barrels/day currently being produced could increase ten-fold, given new inexpensive sources of CO2. This can only happen if the need for reducing green house gases brings (1) research to provide the technology to reduce the cost to separate, capture, transport and store CO2, (2) financial markets emerge to monetize the value of verifiable emission reductions and (3) federal and state governments reduction of the risk of these large projects with changes in the investment tax credits, federal royalties and state severance taxes.
David Hyman, Project Manager with the Department of Energy,
presented the very ambitious DOE Carbon Sequestration Program, mostly carried
out by the regional partnerships mentioned above. Spending for these projects
was $46 million in FY 2005 with over 60% going to research on the capture and
sequestration of CO2. Spending in FY06 is expected to grow by 50%.
The timeline for this activity, beginning in
2003 to 2012 is in phases beginning with geologic
sink opportunities, permitting and regulatory, measurement and
monitoring verification protocols and capture technologies,
through deployment. Clearly, the study of sequestration in
geologic formations builds on a strong industry experience
base and the current activity is focused on active and
depleted oil and gas reservoirs and, to a lesser degree, deep
brine-bearing formations. Future research will expand that
knowledge base to deep, unmineable coal seams and shales.
A cornerstone of the program is
the FutureGen project. (www.fossil.energy.gov/ newsletter/techlines/2005/tl_futuregen_signing.html) This
objective of this $1 billion project is to design, construct
and operate a 275 Megawatt plant to produce electricity,
hydrogen and over a million tons per year of CO2
with near zero emissions. This Integrated Gasification
Combined Cycle (IGCC) project will utilize a variety of fuels
including coal and lignite. The CO2 will be
sequestered in a geologic formation, oil, gas or saline. On
December 6, 2005 the DOE signed an agreement with the
FutureGen Industrial Alliance to build the plant. The Alliance
is made up of eight large coal utilities and developers and
will contribute $250 million of the cost. They plan to issue a
site selection solicitation in March, with proposals due by
May 2006, to develop a short list. Final site selection is
anticipated by Fall 2007. A number of regional consortiums,
including FutureGen Texas, have solicited local proposals in anticipation of the solicitation.

Figure 3 - Worldwide and Permian Basin
CO2 Projects and Oil Price, Courtesy Melzer Consulting
The phrase "tipping point" was used by several speakers at the conference. It was the consensus of the speakers and audience that the convergence of the nation's need for more domestic oil and the economic benefits of that, the maturing of the technology to extract oil left behind with improved recovery techniques, especially CO2, the growing concern over the growth of greenhouse gas, the government's investment in methods of removing and permanently storing these gases and the emerging financial markets for the verifiable reduction are all coming together today for a true win-win outcome. So maybe the curse can indeed become a blessing. |