|
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, in cooperation with
the PTTC Texas Region |
Symposium on Improved Profits Through Best Managed
Practice |
|
November 1, 2005 Free workshop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emission Banking and Trading Program Steve Sun,
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
The
Emission Banking and Trading Programs are designed to provide
maximum flexibility with rules and regulations while still
meeting the environmental goals of Texas. Emission Reduction
Credit (ERC) and Discrete Emission Reduction Credit (DERC)
programs allow companies to claim credits for making voluntary
emission reductions beyond any local, state or federal
regulatory requirements. Reductions that are surplus, real,
quantifiable, enforceable and permanent may be claimed as
credits. These credits may then be used as alternative
compliance for other state requirements or to satisfy
Non-attainment New Source Review Permits. The Emission Banking
and Trading Programs provide an alternative method for
companies to meet regulatory requirements. |
|
|
Natural Gas STAR Program:
Cost-Effective Methane Emission Reductions for Small and
Mid-Size Natural Gas Producers Carey Bylin, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
The
Natural Gas STAR Program is a voluntary partnership that
encourages companies across the natural gas and oil industries
to adopt cost-effective technologies and practices that
improve operational efficiency and reduce emissions of
methane. Methane, the primary component of natural gas, is a
potent greenhouse gas 21 times stronger than CO2.
In the
U.S. the natural gas system encompasses hundreds of thousands
of wells, hundreds of processing facilities, and over a
million miles of transmission and distribution pipeline. All
industry sectors, including gas production, processing,
transmission, and distribution emit methane to the atmosphere
to varying degrees. Methane emissions are generally
process-related, with normal operations, routine maintenance,
and system upsets being the primary contributors. In 2000,
natural gas systems emitted an estimated 116.4 Tg CO2
equivalent of methane. |
|
|
Market Trading and GHGs: Why
trade? Where does it happen? Why an
Agriculturalist? Bruce A. McCarl, Texas A&M
University
The
Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) is the world’s first and North
America’s only voluntary, legally binding rules-based
greenhouse gas emission reduction and trading system. The
mission of the (CCX) is to provide members from the private
and public sectors with cost-effective methods for reducing
their greenhouse gas emissions by building and operating a
market-based emission reduction and trading program that is
flexible, has low transaction costs, is environmentally
rigorous and rewards environmental innovation.
Emissions
of all non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases will be converted to metric
tons CO2 equivalent using the one- hundred- year Global
Warming Potential (GWP) values established by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A CO2 common unit
of emissions quantification has been established based on the
GWP of each non-CO2 gas. |
|
|
Emission Survey of
Houston/Galveston Airshed Russ Nettles, Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality
The Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has been conducting
helicopter flights around the Houston Ship Channel, the Texas
City industrial area, and the Beaumont/Port Arthur industrial
areas using an infrared camera to identify VOC emissions. The
HAWK infrared video camera can view VOC plumes, such as
gasoline vapors and ethylene, that cannot be seen by the human
eye. The project uses the Hawk infrared camera to identify and
characterize VOC emission sources that have possibly been
unreported or under-reported in the agency’s emissions
inventory. The goal is to develop a corrective strategy plan
to minimize VOC emissions from identified plumes.
Barge
Leaks movie Oil
and Gas Field movie Gas
Station movie |
|
|
Ejector Vapor Recovery Unit (EVRU)
Technology Verification Michael Yeater, Total
The EVRU
is a non-mechanical eductor of a jet pump that captures
low-pressure hydrocarbon vapors. It requires high-pressure
motive gas to entrain the low-pressure vapors emanating from
condensate storage tanks. The combined discharge gas stream
exits at an intermediate pressure, which can be used on site
as fuel or re-pressurized with a booster compressor and
injected into a natural gas transmission line for sale. It is
a closed loop system designed to reduce or eliminate emissions
of greenhouse gases (CH4 and CO2) volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), HAPs and other pollutants present in vent gas.
EVRU
EPA Report EVRU
EPA Statement |
|
|
Hydraulic On Line Pressure
Swabbing Mike Wells and Richard Guerra, IPS Field
Services
When a gas
well loads up due to an accumulation of produced fluids in the
tubing, or as a result of treatment fluids pumped down the
tubing, swabbing the well is a common solution. Typically the
well would be piped in to a test or production tank to hold
the recovered fluids, and the produced gas would be vented to
the atmosphere during the swabbing operation.
Producers
can now use the “On Line Swabbing ™” method where specialized
swabbing units have the capability to swab the well directly
into the pressurized production system. The capability to
swab the well back in, or to “swab test”, against the system
pressure has resulted in more effective fluid containment,
reduced methane emissions, valuable well analysis information,
and the ability to sell the produced gas during the swab
operation
The
re-completion or work-over procedures on gas wells typically
require the introduction of fluids into the well bore. The
final phase of the completion process is to clean up the well
bore of the remaining fluid and any solids that have
accumulated as a result of the work-over procedure.
Traditionally these fluids and solids were produced during the
“flow-back” stage into temporary open top tanks for
containment and future disposal. The produced natural gas was
vented to the atmosphere.
Producers can now use the
“Green Flow-Back ™” process where additional pressure control
equipment, holding tanks, and more effective liquid and solid
separators allow the now clean gas to be piped to the existing
gathering system and sold. In addition to substantial
reduction of methane emissions and more effective fluid
containment the producer realizes reduced job costs due to the
resulting sale of the produced gas. |
|
|
HEDR: Hydrocarbon Emissions Detection and
Remediation Pilot Project Peter Mensah,
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
The Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) estimates that over
2000 tons of hydrocarbon based volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) are emitted annually into the atmosphere in the Corpus
Christi area by the oil and gas industry. While negatively
these fugitive emissions contribute to ground level ozone
pollution, which is harmful to plant and animal life,
positively if these VOCs can be safely and effectively
recovered, they can be recycled into useful products and
generate more dollars for the oil and gas industry. Current
methods of detecting hydrocarbon emissions which include
ground-based and passive airborne systems have many
limitations including safety issues and technology application
over an extended period of time. Recently, ITT Industries has
developed a new technology which appears to hold great promise
to detecting hydrocarbon emissions. The ITT Industry’s
Airborne Natural Gas Emissions LIDAR (ANGEL™ ) system is an
active airborne system that can operate safely and is not
limited in anyway. The HEDR pilot project was designed by
Pollution Prevention Partnership to fine tune and test the
capability of this new system to detect (and perhaps quantify)
low levels of hydrocarbon emissions. A staged release of gas
was conducted at an El Paso Production well site near
Kingsville, Texas while the ANGEL system flew overhead.
Through the application of a combination of geospatial
technologies of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Global
Positioning System (GPS), and Remote Sensing data was
collected, processed, and analyzed. |
|
|
Test of Airborne DIAL Lidar for
Hydrocarbon Emission Detection Steve Stearns and
Darryl Murdock, ITT Industries
Over the
summer of 2005 ITT Industries Space Systems Division
successfully detected, measured, and imaged hydrocarbon vapors
released from a battery of condensate storage tanks near
Kingsville, TX. With R&D support from the United States
Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Agency (DOT/PHMSA), ITT Industries is examining the
ability of the ITT Airborne Natural Gas Emission LIDAR (ANGEL)
System to detect and image a wide range of different
hydrocarbons. The objectives of the DOT/PHMSA effort, was to:
1) develop an understanding of hazardous liquid pipeline
leaks, 2) demonstrate the detection of hazardous liquids in
the real world with the ANGEL System, and 3) use this
information to design an airborne sensor system optimized for
the detection of both natural gas and hazardous liquid leaks.
As part of this study, ITT Industries, in cooperation with El
Paso Production and Texas A&M–Corpus Christi, completed
two separate sets of overflights of a natural gas condensate
storage facility near Kingsville, TX. During each set of ANGEL
System overflights, data was collected over the El Paso
facility with the Vapor Recovery Unit (VRU) operating and
again after the VRU was turned off and the thief hatches on
each of the tanks opened to create large emissions. Data from
each of the overflights was processed and the results
analyzed. The ANGEL System was shown to be capable of
detecting and mapping condensate vapor emissions flying an
altitude of 1,000 feet at speeds of up to 120 mph.
|
|
|
Refuse here is a Resource There
well ... Really ? Bob Richards, Southern Research
Institute
Process
streams which are considered waste or refuse in one
application may, through transformation, constitute resources
in others. Verification of whether the transformation is worth
the effort, economically feasible, or “real”, however, may not
be easy. Planning and execution of such verifications
require: • careful definition of verification goals •
consideration of all process inputs and outputs • design
and credible review of a test plan which will meet
verification goals • attention to process and testing
variability • valid statistical evaluations of the
results
Natural
gas dehydration processes have waste or fuel gas streams
which, if recovered, could represent tangible resources. Their
exhaust emissions certainly represent important regulatory
issues as well as significant sources of greenhouse gases.
Engineered Concepts’ “Quantum Leap Technology” (QLT) design
appears to produce a salable product from a toxic process
stream that, at a conventional dehydrator, would be vented. It
also purports to provide significant natural gas fuel savings
and virtually eliminate most toxic and stack gas emissions.
The verification goal, in this case, was to show if these
gains are real.
The test
plan [1] discussed and specified: • measurements to be
taken • field procedures, such as fluid sampling [2] •
laboratory and other analyses • data quality determination
procedures It also provided a structure for field testing,
site coordination, assignment of roles and responsibilities,
and peer review.
The
implementation of this test plan provided verification data
showing that [3]: • QLT reduced benzene, ethylene, toluene,
xylene, and n-hexane (BTEX) emissions by 99.74 ? 0.01 percent
as compared to a conventional natural gas dehydrator • QLT
produced 2.88 gph of salable hydrocarbon liquids, primarily
BTEX • use of the recovered non-condensable hydrocarbon
vapors as fuel avoided the use of natural gas amounting to
approximately 4.16 MMBtu/h, which represents annual savings if
$182,000 per year (gas at $5.00 / MMBtu)
The
quantification of these resources is real because the
well-defined, peer-reviewed tests executed by independent
personnel produced results of known accuracy and quality under
real-world field conditions.
Southern
Research Institute in cooperation with the EPA Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) program conducted all
verification efforts. Southern has found that our verification
tests provide significant credibility because of the rigor of
our technical methods and our independence. Technology
designers, purchasers, financiers, government regulators, and
others value our multifaceted, stakeholder-driven verification
process and our cost-effective approach to difficult field
testing projects. |
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Concepts’ Quantum Leap
Natural Gas Dehydration Technology
(QLD) Don Richards
QLD
EPA Report QLD
EPA Statement |
For
more information please contact Josh McDowell at Texas A&M
Corpus Christi, Josh.McDowell@mail.tamucc.edu,
361-825-5751. |
|
| |