|
Trouble-Shooting Rod-Pumped Wells |
| PTTC Home | Solutions From the Field |
Based on a workshop presented by Oklahoma's Marginal Well Commission and PTTC's South Midcontinent Region, Tulsa, Oklahoma, August 19, 2003
Failure and operating cost reduction begins with an understanding of the basics—equipment, terminology, and sound design principles. Several software packages exist to aid in lift system design. Common failure mechanisms for different components (pumping units, rods, pumps) are known, as are accepted equipment and operating practice solutions. This workshop relayed both the theory and practice of rod-pumping operations, stressing the importance of the team environment in failure reduction efforts.
Artificial lift is a fact of life in mature domestic producing operations, and rod pumps are the most prevalent equipment used. Reducing component failures and pumping costs requires one to combine science with field savvy. This workshop relayed information at both levels, providing something for both the novice and expert practitioner.
Failures (and Corrective Actions), Predictive Programs, Rod Failures, Rod Pumping Basics, Wellbore Management/Failure Reduction
W.L. (Bill) Maxey, Harbison Fischer
Each pumping unit has an API Model Number, which reveals basic information about the pumping unit. For example, the model number C-640D-256-144 refers to a conventional pumping unit with a max torque rating of 640,000 in-lbs at the crankshaft, a maximum polished rod load of 25,600 lbs, and a maximum stroke length of 144 inches. The initial letter denotes the type of pumping unit, as summarized below:
| Conventional (C) | Mark II (M) | Air Balanced (A) | ||
| Beam Balanced (B) | Low Profile (LP) | Reverse Mark (RM) |
The basic components of a rod-drawn pump are: (1) barrel, (2) plunger, (3) standing valve and (4) traveling valve. A fifth basic component, the hold-down seal assembly, may be either a cup-type or mechanical-type. Both work well, although when bottomhole temperatures exceed 250 °F, mechanical-type seals should be used. Mechanical hold-downs with spring steel should not be used in hydrogen sulfide environments. In H2S environments, stainless steel with Monel or copper seats has had some success.
Common sucker rod types include:
API convention for sucker rods is: 5=5/8", 6=3/4", 7=7/8" and 8=1". An 86 tapered rod string would represent a 1" x 7/8" x3/4" string. To keep the rod string in constant tension, it is common to add sinker bars. Some operators run larger rod strings on bottom in lieu of sinker bars.
Rod-Pumping Predictive Programs
There are two different types of programs used today—the generalized API 11L method developed in the 1960s and more modern stress wave programs. API RP11 has limitations (steel rods only, full pump fillage only, high slip motors only, not accurate for shallow wells, conventional pumping units only, vertical wells only, unit presumed to have no structural imbalance). Choices for more modern programs include:
Of these, S ROD is widely recognized as the Cadillac program. It can handle vertical or deviated wells and is the only program that will handle fiberglass rods.
Upon prior arrangement, Harbison Fischer offers a free two-day rod-pumping school at its facilities in Fort Worth. If interested, contact the speaker for further information.
Pumping Unit Failures
There are seven major causes for pumping unit failures.
Sucker Rod Failures
There are ten common causes for rod failures.
Attendees received a copy of Norris's special report, "Sucker Rod Failure Analysis." Much of that information is available online
(www.norrisrods.com/index3.html).
Pump Problems
Failure Meetings, Team Approach to Reducing Failures/Costs
Led by efforts initiated by majors (and their vendors) in the early 1990s, industry has learned that team efforts involving company field and office staff and vendors (chemical, pumps, rods, tubing, etc.) that are focused on identifying failure causes and initiating solutions can yield significant results—as much as ten-fold improvement in failure rate. Smaller independents can incorporate the same concepts to reap benefits, albeit on a smaller scale. NOTE — see the PTTC-developed "Produced Water & Associated Issues" manual (www.pttc.org/pwm/produced_water.htm) for further information about proven practices for failure and cost reduction.
W.L. (Bill) Maxey
Harbison Fischer
P.O. Box 95127
Oklahoma City, OK 73143
Phone: 405-354-9389
Email: bmaxey@hfpumps.com
For information on PTTC’s South Midcontinent Region and its activities contact:
Charles Mankin, Director, Oklahoma Geological Survey
100 E. Boyd St., Room N131, Norman, OK 73019-0628
Phone 405-325-3031, Fax 405-325-7069, Email cjmankin@ou.edu
Disclaimer: No specific application of products or services is endorsed by PTTC. Reasonable steps are taken to ensure the reliability of sources for information that PTTC disseminates; individuals and institutions are solely responsible for the consequences of its use.
The not-for-profit Petroleum Technology Transfer Council is funded primarily by the US Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy, with additional funding from universities, state geological surveys, several state governments, and industry donations.
Petroleum Technology Transfer Council, 16010 Barkers Point Lane, Ste 220, Houston, TX 77079
toll-free 1-888-THE-PTTC; fax 281-921-1723; Email hq@pttc.org; web
www.pttc.org
| PTTC Home | Solutions From the Field |
|
We encourage your comments, please send us email at: hq@pttc.org. Copyright © 2003 Petroleum Technology Transfer Council |